These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38716650)
1. Digest: When sexual selection hits the wall of natural selection. O'Loughlin BS; Marcondes RS Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(7):1347-1348. PubMed ID: 38716650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surviving the serenade: how conflicting selection pressures shape the early stages of sexual signal diversification. Gallagher JH; Broder ED; Wikle AW; O'Toole H; Durso C; Tinghitella RM Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):835-848. PubMed ID: 38436989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Thomas ML; Simmons LW BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 9():162. PubMed ID: 19594896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ). Bailey NW; Zuk M Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1742):3589-96. PubMed ID: 22648156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multivariate sexual selection in a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype. Oh KP; Shaw KL Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jun; 280(1761):20130482. PubMed ID: 23760640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Slate J; Walling CA; Tregenza T Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5983):1269-72. PubMed ID: 20522773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digest: Sexual selection may shape species' range limits. Sinclair OR; Taberer TR Evolution; 2024 May; 78(6):1201-1202. PubMed ID: 38666728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication. Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina. Grace JL; Shaw KL Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 21790568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations. Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected. Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beauty or function? The opposing effects of natural and sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in male black field crickets. Mitchell C; Wylde Z; Del Castillo E; Rapkin J; House CM; Hunt J J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1266-1281. PubMed ID: 37534753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inbreeding depression in the competitive fertilization success of male crickets. Simmons LW J Evol Biol; 2011 Feb; 24(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 21091574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Community composition affects the shape of mate response functions. Symes LB Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2005-13. PubMed ID: 24689891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential aging of bite and jump performance in virgin and mated Teleogryllus commodus crickets. Lailvaux SP; Zajitschek F; Dessman J; Brooks R Evolution; 2011 Nov; 65(11):3138-47. PubMed ID: 22023581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes? Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Hadfield JD; Tregenza T Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18327649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetric mating preferences accommodated the rapid evolutionary loss of a sexual signal. Tinghitella RM; Zuk M Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2087-98. PubMed ID: 19473387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual selection and population divergence I: The influence of socially flexible cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus). Pascoal S; Mendrok M; Mitchell C; Wilson AJ; Hunt J; Bailey NW Evolution; 2016 Jan; 70(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26678168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness. Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]