119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38716774)
1. Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.
Bosio A; Alessandria E; Gozzo C; Vercelli E; Micai L; Bertello G; Pasquale G; Sedigh O; Oderda M; Biancone L; Gontero P
Clin Transplant; 2024 May; 38(5):e15321. PubMed ID: 38716774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.
Hughes T; Pietropaolo A; Jones P; Oderda M; Gontero P; Somani BK
Curr Urol Rep; 2021 Jun; 22(8):41. PubMed ID: 34128107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.
Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Palmero JL; Patterson JM; Proietti S; Straub M; de la Rosette J; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 27988848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible cystoscopy for ureteral stent removal without antimicrobial prophylaxis. A prospective observational study.
Olivero A; Riccardi N; Ndrevataj D; Balzarini F; Cerasuolo M; Bottino P; Borghesi M; Dodi F; Terrone C
Urologia; 2021 May; 88(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 33325327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient ureteric stent removal following kidney transplantation.
Georgiades F; Silva ANS; Purohit K; King S; Torpey N; Saeb-Parsy K; Pettigrew GJ; Rouhani FJ
Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(2):152-154. PubMed ID: 34435203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Ureteral Stent Colonization in Live-Donor Renal Transplant Recipients.
Sarier M; Demir M; Duman I; Yuksel Y; Demirbas A
Transplant Proc; 2017 Apr; 49(3):415-419. PubMed ID: 28340803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ureteral stent removal after kidney transplantation.
Lee JH; Muthukumar T; Kim J; Aull MJ; Watkins A; Kapur S; Hartono C
Clin Transplant; 2019 Mar; 33(3):e13491. PubMed ID: 30697807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Removal of Double-J Stents Decreases Urinary Tract Infections in Living Donor Renal Transplantation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Liu S; Luo G; Sun B; Lu J; Zu Q; Yang S; Zhang X; Dong J
Transplant Proc; 2017 Mar; 49(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 28219588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: a cost-benefit analysis.
Liu H; Pan W; Zhang N
Urol J; 2018 Nov; 15(6):329-332. PubMed ID: 30251748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
