These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38717286)

  • 1. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: Trade-offs between Sensitivity and Specificity.
    Bahl M; Do S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e240184. PubMed ID: 38717286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: primary care provider preferences.
    Hendrix N; Hauber B; Lee CI; Bansal A; Veenstra DL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 33367670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial Intelligence Improves Breast Cancer Screening in Study.
    Abbasi J
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(6):499. PubMed ID: 32044919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of computer aided detection in mammography.
    Katzen J; Dodelzon K
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():305-309. PubMed ID: 30216858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
    Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening: breathtaking results and a word of caution.
    Segnan N; Ponti A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):830-832. PubMed ID: 37541268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer subtype and screening sensitivity in the Quebec Mammography Screening Program.
    Perron L; Chang SL; Daigle JM; Vandal N; Theberge I; Diorio C; Lemieux J; Pelletier E; Brisson J
    J Med Screen; 2019 Sep; 26(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 30572782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: experience of use of the ScreenPoint Medical Transpara system in 310 Japanese women.
    Sasaki M; Tozaki M; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Yotsumoto D; Ichiki Y; Terawaki A; Oosako S; Sagara Y; Sagara Y
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jul; 27(4):642-651. PubMed ID: 32052311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the
    Mann RM; Teuwen J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jun; 222(6):e2330359. PubMed ID: 37850578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.
    Dahlblom V; Dustler M; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3754-3765. PubMed ID: 36502459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.
    Fuller MS; Lee CI; Elmore JG
    Med Clin North Am; 2015 May; 99(3):451-68. PubMed ID: 25841594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathways to breast cancer screening artificial intelligence algorithm validation.
    Lee CI; Houssami N; Elmore JG; Buist DSM
    Breast; 2020 Aug; 52():146-149. PubMed ID: 31540699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging Daily Clinical Practice: Point-Reshaping Breast Cancer Screening.
    Gastounioti A; Kontos D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Sep; 223(3):e2431174. PubMed ID: 38534190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Efficacy of Four Imaging Instruments for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Mehnati P; Tirtash MJ
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6177-86. PubMed ID: 26434814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Lowry KP; Zuiderveld CC
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2024 Jul; 62(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 38777538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test sensitivity of mammography and mean sojourn time over 40 years of breast cancer screening in Nijmegen (The Netherlands).
    Aarts A; Duffy SW; Geurts S; Vulkan DP; Otten J; Hsu CY; Chen T; Verbeek A; Broeders M
    J Med Screen; 2019 Sep; 26(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 30541383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging.
    Vedantham S; Shazeeb MS; Chiang A; Vijayaraghavan GR
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2023 Feb; 44(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 36792270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is clinical breast examination effective in Japan? Consideration from the age-specific performance of breast cancer screening combining mammography with clinical breast examination.
    Ohta K; Kasahara Y; Tanaka F; Maeda H
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 24925524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.