124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38717617)
1. A constrained maximum likelihood approach to developing well-calibrated models for predicting binary outcomes.
Cao Y; Ma W; Zhao G; McCarthy AM; Chen J
Lifetime Data Anal; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38717617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
; ;
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for prediction calibration.
Brooks J; van der Laan MJ; Go AS
Int J Biostat; 2012 Oct; 8(1):30. PubMed ID: 23152434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.
Batterman S; Su FC; Li S; Mukherjee B; Jia C;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (181):3-63. PubMed ID: 25145040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construction and assessment of prediction rules for binary outcome in the presence of missing predictor data using multiple imputation and cross-validation: Methodological approach and data-based evaluation.
Mertens BJA; Banzato E; de Wreede LC
Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):724-741. PubMed ID: 32052492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.
Vernooij LM; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Takada T; van Waes J; Damen JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD013139. PubMed ID: 34931303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling.
van Opheusden B; Acerbi L; Ma WJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008483. PubMed ID: 33362195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Wally plot approach to assess the calibration of clinical prediction models.
Blanche P; Gerds TA; Ekstrøm CT
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jan; 25(1):150-167. PubMed ID: 29214550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semiparametric estimation for nonparametric frailty models using nonparametric maximum likelihood approach.
Chee CS; Do Ha I; Seo B; Lee Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2485-2502. PubMed ID: 34569366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of approaches for incorporating new information into existing risk prediction models.
Grill S; Ankerst DP; Gail MH; Chatterjee N; Pfeiffer RM
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1134-1156. PubMed ID: 27943382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric density ratio model.
Diao G; Ning J; Qin J
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jun; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22745024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved nonparametric penalized maximum likelihood estimation for arbitrarily censored survival data.
Tubbs JD; Chen LG; Thach TQ; Sham PC
Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(20):4006-4021. PubMed ID: 35750329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-phase stratified sampling and analysis for predicting binary outcomes.
Cao Y; Haneuse S; Zheng Y; Chen J
Biostatistics; 2023 Jul; 24(3):585-602. PubMed ID: 34923588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Force-Field Calibration.
Zaborowski B; Jagieła D; Czaplewski C; Hałabis A; Lewandowska A; Żmudzińska W; Ołdziej S; Karczyńska A; Omieczynski C; Wirecki T; Liwo A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):2050-70. PubMed ID: 26263302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
