These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology. Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling. Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local Riemannian geometry of model manifolds and its implications for practical parameter identifiability. Lill D; Timmer J; Kaschek D PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217837. PubMed ID: 31158252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational methods for a class of network models. Wang J; Jasra A; De Iorio M J Comput Biol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 24144112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling. Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal experimental design with the sigma point method. Schenkendorf R; Kremling A; Mangold M IET Syst Biol; 2009 Jan; 3(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19154081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculating all multiple parameter solutions of ODE models to avoid biological misinterpretations. Saccomani MP; Thomaseth K Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(6):6438-6453. PubMed ID: 31698571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An efficient Monte Carlo method for estimating Ne from temporally spaced samples using a coalescent-based likelihood. Anderson EC Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):955-67. PubMed ID: 15834143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative assessment of parameter estimation methods in the presence of overdispersion: a simulation study. Roosa K; Luo R; Chowell G Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4299-4313. PubMed ID: 31499663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing parameter identifiability in compartmental dynamic models using a computational approach: application to infectious disease transmission models. Roosa K; Chowell G Theor Biol Med Model; 2019 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 30642334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment. Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]