These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38718526)

  • 1. Recovery of DNA from acetaminophen exploring physical state and sampling methods.
    Bertram AM; Conlan XA; van Oorschot RAH; Durdle A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112046. PubMed ID: 38718526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary investigation into isolation and extraction of DNA recovered from drug residues.
    Bertram AM; Conlan XA; van Oorschot RAH; Durdle AM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Feb; 343():111551. PubMed ID: 36638701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compatibility of DNA IQ™, QIAamp
    Lin SW; Ip SC; Lam TT; Tan TF; Yeung WL; Tam WM
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Mar; 131(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 27654715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study for the isolation of exogenous trace DNA from fingernails.
    Hayden DD; Wallin JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():119-128. PubMed ID: 30640083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.
    Radojicic V; Keckarevic Markovic M; Puac F; Kecmanovic M; Keckarevic D
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 29536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Processing Fingerprint Powder-Coated Forensic Evidence.
    Cornwell SJ; Tay JW; Allan RK; Zoranjic J; O'Rourke NJ; Byard GB; Rye MS
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):960-965. PubMed ID: 31688972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA recovery after sequential processing of latent fingerprints on black polyethylene plastic.
    Bathrick AS; Norsworthy S; Plaza DT; McCormick MN; Slack D; Ramotowski RS
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):993-1001. PubMed ID: 38402545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical study on direct PCR amplification using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit on human bloodstains collected with microFLOQ™ Direct swabs.
    Chong KWY; Wong Y; Ng BK; Lim WSH; Rosli AR; Syn CKC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():43-50. PubMed ID: 31075566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
    Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA quality and quantity from up to 16 years old post-mortem blood stored on FTA cards.
    Rahikainen AL; Palo JU; de Leeuw W; Budowle B; Sajantila A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():148-53. PubMed ID: 26937857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.
    Sheth N; Swaminathan H; Gonzalez AJ; Duffy KR; Grgicak CM
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):727-738. PubMed ID: 33484330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods tested on illicit drug-related powders.
    Griffin A; Kirkbride KP; Henry J; Painter B; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Nov; 67():102927. PubMed ID: 37579544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing DNA recovery and profile determination from bloody snow.
    Biggin MRK; Albrecht I; Novroski NMM
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 35277228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ESDA®-Lite collection of DNA from latent fingerprints on documents.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():8-12. PubMed ID: 25479402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New incompatibilities uncovered using the Promega DNA IQ™ chemistry.
    Laurin N; Célestin F; Clark M; Wilkinson D; Yamashita B; Frégeau C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():134-141. PubMed ID: 26295931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.