109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38720727)
1. A framework for performance enhancement of classifiers in detection of prostate cancer from microarray gene.
Mani K; Rajaguru H
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e29630. PubMed ID: 38720727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancement of Classifier Performance Using Swarm Intelligence in Detection of Diabetes from Pancreatic Microarray Gene Data.
Chellappan D; Rajaguru H
Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 37887634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Diabetes through Microarray Genes with Enhancement of Classifiers Performance.
Chellappan D; Rajaguru H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 37627916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation and Exploration of Machine Learning and Convolutional Neural Network Classifiers in Detection of Lung Cancer from Microarray Gene-A Paradigm Shift.
M S K; Rajaguru H; Nair AR
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 37627818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A fuzzy based feature selection from independent component subspace for machine learning classification of microarray data.
Aziz R; Verma CK; Srivastava N
Genom Data; 2016 Jun; 8():4-15. PubMed ID: 27081632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct Kernel Perceptron (DKP): ultra-fast kernel ELM-based classification with non-iterative closed-form weight calculation.
Fernández-Delgado M; Cernadas E; Barro S; Ribeiro J; Neves J
Neural Netw; 2014 Feb; 50():60-71. PubMed ID: 24287336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the efficacy of multi-flavored feature extraction with radiomics and deep features for prostate cancer grading on mpMRI.
Khanfari H; Mehranfar S; Cheki M; Mohammadi Sadr M; Moniri S; Heydarheydari S; Rezaeijo SM
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):195. PubMed ID: 37993801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.
Sahoo AJ; Kumar Y
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):531-45. PubMed ID: 24898862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods.
Taghizadeh E; Heydarheydari S; Saberi A; JafarpoorNesheli S; Rezaeijo SM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 36183055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of SVM methods combined with voxel selection for object category classification on fMRI data.
Song S; Zhan Z; Long Z; Zhang J; Yao L
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17191. PubMed ID: 21359184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid Feature-Learning-Based PSO-PCA Feature Engineering Approach for Blood Cancer Classification.
Atteia G; Alnashwan R; Hassan M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 37627931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skill-level classification and performance evaluation for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.
Dials J; Demirel D; Sanchez-Arias R; Halic T; Kruger U; De S; Gromski MA
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4754-4765. PubMed ID: 36897405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data.
Pirooznia M; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 18366602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Particle Swarm Optimized Hybrid Kernel-Based Multiclass Support Vector Machine for Microarray Cancer Data Analysis.
Segera D; Mbuthia M; Nyete A
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4085725. PubMed ID: 31998772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine Learning Techniques for the Performance Enhancement of Multiple Classifiers in the Detection of Cardiovascular Disease from PPG Signals.
Palanisamy S; Rajaguru H
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 37370609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive exploration of machine learning techniques for EEG-based anxiety detection.
Aldayel M; Al-Nafjan A
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2024; 10():e1829. PubMed ID: 38435618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic benchmarking of microarray data classification: assessing the role of non-linearity and dimensionality reduction.
Pochet N; De Smet F; Suykens JA; De Moor BL
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):3185-95. PubMed ID: 15231531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer detection using machine learning techniques by employing combination of features extracting strategies.
Hussain L; Ahmed A; Saeed S; Rathore S; Awan IA; Shah SA; Majid A; Idris A; Awan AA
Cancer Biomark; 2018 Feb; 21(2):393-413. PubMed ID: 29226857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
