139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38725819)
1. Evaluation of the effect of surface roughness and modification of implant abutment axial wall on the retention of zirconium oxide copings before and after thermocycling.
Amini P; Hejazi M; Taghva M; Safari S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e399-e405. PubMed ID: 38725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements.
Linkevicius T; Caplikas A; Dumbryte I; Linkeviciene L; Svediene O
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 30711294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Effect of Axial Wall Modification and Coping Design on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant-supported Crowns.
Derafshi R; Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Farzin M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 25973152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.
Safari S; Hosseini Ghavam F; Amini P; Yaghmaei K
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29503708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of zirconia crown to oxidized titanium base abutment: Experimental research.
Krongvanitchayakul R; Kunavisarut C
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287108. PubMed ID: 37878631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surface pretreatment and artificial aging on the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented to zirconia implant abutments.
Reary JA; Katsavochristou A; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):459-467. PubMed ID: 35513920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.
Sahu N; Lakshmi N; Azhagarasan NS; Agnihotri Y; Rajan M; Hariharan R
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jan; 8(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 24596785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of using nano and micro airborne abrasive particles on bond strength of implant abutment to prosthesis.
Rismanchian M; Davoudi A; Shadmehr E
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 25672384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.
Dähne F; Meißner H; Böning K; Arnold C; Gutwald R; Prause E
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):62. PubMed ID: 34282495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
