These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38726463)

  • 1. Time-dependent probabilistic tsunami risk assessment: application to Tofino, British Columbia, Canada, subjected to Cascadia subduction earthquakes.
    Goda K; De Risi R
    NPJ Nat Hazards; 2024; 1(1):7. PubMed ID: 38726463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new chronology for tsunami deposits prior to the 1700 CE Cascadia earthquake from Vancouver Island, Canada.
    Tanigawa K; Sawai Y; Bobrowsky P; Huntley D; Goff J; Shinozaki T; Ito K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12527. PubMed ID: 35869244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Margin-Wide Rupture Behaviors Along the Cascadia Megathrust With 3-D Dynamic Rupture Simulations.
    Ramos MD; Huang Y; Ulrich T; Li D; Gabriel AA; Thomas AM
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2021 Jul; 126(7):e2021JB022005. PubMed ID: 35865234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment along Karnataka Coast from Makran Subduction Zone, west coast of India.
    K S; Kumar CP; Jayappa KS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Oct; 190(11):679. PubMed ID: 30368612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cascadia megathrust earthquake rupture model constrained by geodetic fault locking.
    Li D; Liu Y
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200135. PubMed ID: 33715408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shallow slip amplification and enhanced tsunami hazard unravelled by dynamic simulations of mega-thrust earthquakes.
    Murphy S; Scala A; Herrero A; Lorito S; Festa G; Trasatti E; Tonini R; Romano F; Molinari I; Nielsen S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35007. PubMed ID: 27725733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation of tsunamis from great earthquakes on the cascadia subduction zone.
    Ng MK; Leblond PH; Murty TS
    Science; 1990 Nov; 250(4985):1248-51. PubMed ID: 17829212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Near-simultaneous great earthquakes at Tongan megathrust and outer rise in September 2009.
    Beavan J; Wang X; Holden C; Wilson K; Power W; Prasetya G; Bevis M; Kautoke R
    Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):959-63. PubMed ID: 20725037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing impacts of Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone tsunamis in California under future sea-level rise.
    Dura T; Garner AJ; Weiss R; Kopp RE; Engelhart SE; Witter RC; Briggs RW; Mueller CS; Nelson AR; Horton BP
    Nat Commun; 2021 Dec; 12(1):7119. PubMed ID: 34880254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aftereffects of Subduction-Zone Earthquakes: Potential Tsunami Hazards along the Japan Sea Coast.
    Minoura K; Sugawara D; Yamanoi T; Yamada T
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2015 Oct; 237(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 26399180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A silent slip event on the deeper Cascadia subduction interface.
    Dragert G; Wang K; James TS
    Science; 2001 May; 292(5521):1525-8. PubMed ID: 11313500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Earthquake hazards on the cascadia subduction zone.
    Heaton TH; Hartzell SH
    Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4798):162-8. PubMed ID: 17789780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Datasets of disrupted transportation networks on Canada's West Coast in a plausible M9.0 Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake scenario.
    Souza Almeida L; Rodrigues L; Goerlandt F; Ancona-Segovia J; Pelot R; Bristow D; Chang S
    Data Brief; 2023 Feb; 46():108762. PubMed ID: 36478688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of hazard brochures using topic viewing durations: Application to tsunami evacuation brochures.
    Lindell MK; Jung MC; Prater CS; House DH
    Risk Anal; 2023 Oct; 43(10):2129-2146. PubMed ID: 36635916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stochastic coupled simulation of strong motion and tsunami for the 2011 Tohoku, Japan earthquake.
    Goda K; Petrone C; De Risi R; Rossetto T
    Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess; 2017; 31(9):2337-2355. PubMed ID: 32009849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic quantification of tsunami current hazard using statistical emulation.
    Gopinathan D; Heidarzadeh M; Guillas S
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 Jun; 477(2250):20210180. PubMed ID: 35153568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Palaeotsunamis and tsunami hazards in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    England P; Howell A; Jackson J; Synolakis C
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Oct; 373(2053):. PubMed ID: 26392624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geological and historical evidence of irregular recurrent earthquakes in Japan.
    Satake K
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Oct; 373(2053):. PubMed ID: 26392616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential tsunami risk assessment to the city of Alexandria, Egypt.
    El-Hattab MM; Mohamed SA; El Raey M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):496. PubMed ID: 30069606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomy of strike-slip fault tsunami genesis.
    Elbanna A; Abdelmeguid M; Ma X; Amlani F; Bhat HS; Synolakis C; Rosakis AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(19):. PubMed ID: 33941671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.