117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38728047)
1. Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Alsabeeha NHM; Amir-Rad F; Ma S; Shah M; Hannawi H; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WJ; Baqain ZH; Atieh MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-23. PubMed ID: 38728047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial.
Zumstein K; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Benic G; Mühlemann S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 37668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Spitznagel FA; Balmer M; Wiedemeier DB; Jung RE; Gierthmuehlen PC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34665900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.
Zhang Y; Luo J; Di P; Chen B; Li J; Yu Z; Lin Y
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37302066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Latyshev A; Rabel K; Kohal RJ; Karasan D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):254-288. PubMed ID: 34642991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Single Crowns: One-Year Results.
Cheng CW; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29528175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Aug; 33(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 35633183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant-supported multi-unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area.
Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Merino-Higuera E; Spies BC; Burkhardt F; Karasan D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Sep; 34 Suppl 26():86-103. PubMed ID: 37750526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peri-implant marginal bone changes with implant-supported metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia single crowns: A retrospective clinical study of 1 to 5 years.
Shen XT; Li JY; Luo X; Feng Y; Gai LT; He FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):368-374. PubMed ID: 33618860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
Sadowsky SJ
Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.
Cantner F; Cacaci C; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 30887188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.
Kim W; Li XC; Bidra AS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 35929416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
