These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38728134)

  • 21. Closing the gap between palaeontological and neontological speciation and extinction rate estimates.
    Silvestro D; Warnock RCM; Gavryushkina A; Stadler T
    Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5237. PubMed ID: 30532040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Homoplasy and clade support.
    Brandley MC; Warren DL; Leaché AD; McGuire JA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 20525577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limitations of locally sampled characters in phylogenetic analyses of sparse supermatrices.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 May; 74():1-14. PubMed ID: 24530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distance metrics for ranked evolutionary trees.
    Kim J; Rosenberg NA; Palacios JA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(46):28876-28886. PubMed ID: 33139566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology.
    Asher RJ; Smith MR
    Syst Biol; 2022 Jun; 71(4):986-1008. PubMed ID: 34469583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.
    Whidden C; Zeh N; Beiko RG
    Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 24695589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phylogeny, paleontology, and primates: do incomplete fossils bias the tree of life?
    Pattinson DJ; Thompson RS; Piotrowski AK; Asher RJ
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 25239212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction using empirical morphological data.
    Schrago CG; Aguiar BO; Mello B
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 29957887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rearrangement moves on rooted phylogenetic networks.
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Jones M; Lafond M; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005611. PubMed ID: 28763439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does exceptional preservation distort our view of disparity in the fossil record?
    Flannery Sutherland JT; Moon BC; Stubbs TL; Benton MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20190091. PubMed ID: 30963850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.
    Li Y; Ruta M; Wills MA
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):638-659. PubMed ID: 31769837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.
    Simões TR; Vernygora OV; de Medeiros BAS; Wright AM
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):662-680. PubMed ID: 36773019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Defying death: incorporating fossils into the phylogeny of the complex thalloid liverworts (Marchantiidae, Marchantiophyta) confirms high order clades but reveals discrepancies in family-level relationships.
    Flores JR; Bippus AC; Suárez GM; Hyvönen J
    Cladistics; 2021 Jun; 37(3):231-247. PubMed ID: 34478198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing models on the genealogical relationships among Neandertal, Cro-Magnoid and modern Europeans by serial coalescent simulations.
    Belle EM; Benazzo A; Ghirotto S; Colonna V; Barbujani G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Mar; 102(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 18971954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data.
    Puttick MN; O'Reilly JE; Tanner AR; Fleming JF; Clark J; Holloway L; Lozano-Fernandez J; Parry LA; Tarver JE; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 284(1846):. PubMed ID: 28077778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sampling diverse characters improves phylogenies: Craniodental and postcranial characters of vertebrates often imply different trees.
    Mounce RC; Sansom R; Wills MA
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):666-86. PubMed ID: 26899622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new family of dissimilarity metrics for discrete character matrices that include inapplicable characters and its importance for disparity studies.
    Hopkins MJ; St John K
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Nov; 285(1892):. PubMed ID: 30487309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Iterative character weighting based on mutation frequency: a new method for constructing phyletic trees.
    van Ooyen A; Hogeweg P
    J Mol Evol; 1990 Oct; 31(4):330-42. PubMed ID: 2124280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ancient dates or accelerated rates? Morphological clocks and the antiquity of placental mammals.
    Beck RM; Lee MS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1793):. PubMed ID: 25165770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.