These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38728145)

  • 21. Ideal placement of an implant considering the positional relationship to an opposing tooth in the first molar region: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Morita J; Wada M; Mameno T; Maeda Y; Ikebe K
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Jul; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 32607761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of angled abutments in the posterior maxillary region on tilted implants: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Chen P; Zhang J; Yao J; Hu F; Song L; Yu Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38653881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2017 Aug; 47(4):251-262. PubMed ID: 28861289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around implant with straight and angled abutments in different bone qualities.
    Arun Kumar G; Mahesh B; George D
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Dec; 13(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 24431777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Stress Distribution Among Two Different Pre-angled Abutments of Implants in Two Different Densities of Bone at Different Levels Along the Implant-/n Vitro Study.
    Singh NK; Chalapathy SB; Thota RP; Chakravarthula K; Tirnati R; Yenugupalli K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 30602643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of different implant locations and abutment types on stress and strain distribution under non-axial loading: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sakar D; Guncu MB; Arikan H; Muhtarogullari M; Aktas G; Reiss N; Turkyilmaz I
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):607-613. PubMed ID: 38303808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
    Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Martini AP; Freitas AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Kina S; Fasolo GB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):415-8. PubMed ID: 22421854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immediate Loading Using the Digitalized Customized Restoration of Single-tooth Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Aesthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level.
    Berberi A; Zoghbi AE; Aad G; Tehini G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Mar; 25(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 38690692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge.
    Cavallaro J; Greenstein G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Feb; 142(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 21282680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Mourya A; Nahar R; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(2):313-320. PubMed ID: 33816100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hydrothermal aging affects the three-dimensional fit and fatigue lifetime of zirconia abutments.
    Bergamo ETP; Campos TMB; Lopes ACO; Cardoso KB; Gouvea MVR; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Witek L; Gierthmühlen PC; Coelho PG; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Zahoui A; de Carvalho LF; Bonfante EA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104832. PubMed ID: 34536801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.
    Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress behavior of an anterior single implant restored with high-performance polymer abutments under immediate and delayed loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 36007157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel bendable abutments as a solution to correct unfavorable implant inclination. A clinical report.
    Carpena ALMM; de Azevedo Kinalski M; Bergoli CD; Dos Santos MBF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Dec; 32(8):757-762. PubMed ID: 32897646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.