These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38729132)
21. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes. Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection. Das N; Biesmans W; Bertrand A; Francart T J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056014. PubMed ID: 27618842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Marsella P; Scorpecci A; Cartocci G; Giannantonio S; Maglione AG; Venuti I; Brizi A; Babiloni F Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial. Henshaw H; Heinrich A; Tittle A; Ferguson M Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):741-763. PubMed ID: 34524150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Towards decoding selective attention through cochlear implant electrodes as sensors in subjects with contralateral acoustic hearing. Aldag N; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35062007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners. Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Neural Representation Enhanced for Speech and Reduced for Background Noise With a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Scheme During a Selective Attention Task. Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Hietkamp R; Ng EHN; Graversen C Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():846. PubMed ID: 33071722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EEG-Informed Attended Speaker Extraction From Recorded Speech Mixtures With Application in Neuro-Steered Hearing Prostheses. Van Eyndhoven S; Francart T; Bertrand A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 May; 64(5):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 27392339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Linear versus deep learning methods for noisy speech separation for EEG-informed attention decoding. Das N; Zegers J; Van Hamme H; Francart T; Bertrand A J Neural Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(4):046039. PubMed ID: 32679578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise. Price CN; Bidelman GM Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 235():118014. PubMed ID: 33794356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers. Boyd AW; Whitmer WM; Soraghan JJ; Akeroyd MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL268-74. PubMed ID: 22423819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources. J Neural Eng; ; . PubMed ID: 28776506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]