These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38729185)

  • 1. Advancements in AMA Guides Musculoskeletal Impairment Evaluations: Improved Reliability and Ease of Use.
    Melhorn JM; Gelinas B; Martin DW; Hegmann KT; Thiese MS
    J Occup Environ Med; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38729185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Analysis of Upper Limb Impairment Rating Processes in the AMA Guides Sixth Edition 2024 vs 2008: Impact on Stakeholders.
    Melhorn JM; Gelinas B; Martin DW; Hegmann KT; Thiese MS
    J Occup Environ Med; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39016248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impairment rating ambiguity in the United States: the Utah Impairment Guides for calculating workers' compensation impairments.
    Colledge A; Hunter B; Bunkall LD; Holmes EB
    J Korean Med Sci; 2009 May; 24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S232-41. PubMed ID: 19503678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes for the new AMA Guides to impairment ratings, 6th Edition: implications and applications for physician disability evaluations.
    Rondinelli RD
    PM R; 2009 Jul; 1(7):643-56. PubMed ID: 19627958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment.
    Forst L; Friedman L; Chukwu A
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Dec; 52(12):1201-3. PubMed ID: 21124242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Analysis of Impairment Ratings From the 5th to 6th Editions of the AMA Guides.
    Busse JW; de Vaal MM; Ham SJ; Sadeghirad B; van Beers LWAH; Couban RJ; Kallyth SM; Poolman RW
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Dec; 60(12):1108-1111. PubMed ID: 30252722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. American Medical Association.
    Spieler EA; Barth PS; Burton JF; Himmelstein J; Rudolph L
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 10659879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining foot and ankle impairments by the AMA fifth edition guides.
    Harper JD
    Foot Ankle Clin; 2002 Jun; 7(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 12462111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower extremity impairment ratings. AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fourth Edition.
    Lea RD
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 7(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 24572666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.
    Nitschke JE; Nattrass CL; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10025021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Merits and shortcomings of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th edition. A physiatric perspective.
    Rondinelli RD; Katz RT
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2002 May; 13(2):355-70, x. PubMed ID: 12122851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary on the American Medical Association guides' lumbar impairment validity checks.
    Zuberbier OA; Hunt DG; Kozlowski AJ; Berkowitz J; Schultz IZ; Crook JM; Milner RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(24):2735-7. PubMed ID: 11740365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommended guide to the evaluation of permanent impairment of the temporomandibular joint.
    Phillips DJ; Walters PJ; Rogal OJ; Stack BC; Weiner LB; Klemons IM
    Cranio; 1989 Jan; 7(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 2611894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impairment ratings and disability issues of the upper extremity.
    Jones FE
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 8(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 24572712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A primer for workers' compensation.
    Bible JE; Spengler DM; Mir HR
    Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1325-31. PubMed ID: 24462532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain, impairment, and disability in the AMA guides.
    Robinson JP; Turk DC; Loeser JD
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):315-26, 191. PubMed ID: 15301196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary on Reliability of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment.
    Rondinelli RD
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Dec; 52(12):1204-5. PubMed ID: 21150378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment and commentary.
    Talmage JB; Martin DW
    J Occup Environ Med; 2011 Apr; 53(4):345. PubMed ID: 21478721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Burden of Treatment Compliance as an Impairment Rating Metric.
    Demeter SL
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 Aug; 30(3):581-587. PubMed ID: 31227133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common Metrics for Impairment Ratings.
    Brigham CR
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 Aug; 30(3):533-540. PubMed ID: 31227129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.