122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38730091)
1. Long-term urodynamic findings following colo-, gastro- and ileocystoplasty.
Juhász ZS; Kispál Z; Kardos D; Vajda P
Pediatr Surg Int; 2024 May; 40(1):131. PubMed ID: 38730091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-evaluation of histological findings after colocystoplasty and gastrocystoplasty.
Kardos DJ; Kereskai L; Tornoczky T; Farkas K; Davidovics A; Farkas A; Vastyan AM; Pinter AB; Vajda P
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):651.e1-651.e8. PubMed ID: 31735521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term histological and mucin alterations in the neobladder mucosa following urinary bladder augmentation or substitution with gastrointestinal segment.
Kispal ZF; Kardos D; Jilling T; Kereskai L; Isaacs M; Balogh DL; Pinter AB; Till H; Vajda P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):349.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26298391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urinary continence outcome after augmentation ileocystoplasty as a single surgical procedure in patients with myelodysplasia.
Medel R; Ruarte AC; Herrera M; Castera R; Podesta ML
J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 2):1849-52. PubMed ID: 12352374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bladder augmentation: ureterocystoplasty versus ileocystoplasty.
Landau EH; Jayanthi VR; Khoury AE; Churchill BM; Gilmour RF; Steckler RE; McLorie GA
J Urol; 1994 Aug; 152(2 Pt 2):716-9. PubMed ID: 8022003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The local microbiome after pediatric bladder augmentation: intestinal segments and the native urinary bladder host similar mucosal microbiota.
Kispal ZF; Vajda P; Kardos D; Klymiuk I; Moissl-Eichinger C; Castellani C; Singer G; Till H
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):30.e1-30.e7. PubMed ID: 30206025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Continence in the myelodysplastic patient following enterocystoplasty.
Cher ML; Allen TD
J Urol; 1993 May; 149(5):1103-6. PubMed ID: 8483222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative ileal flap for bladder augmentation if mesentery is short.
Cserni T; Cervellione RM; Hajnal D; Varga G; Kubiak R; Rakoczy G; Kaszaki J; Boros M; Goyal A; Dickson A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):64.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25824877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Urodynamic changes after bladder augmentation surgery in paediatric patients with myelomeningocele due to neurogenic bladder].
Zaragoza Torres RI; Galarza-Flores ME; Gómez-Castellanos JC; Barrera-de León JC
Cir Cir; 2016; 84(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 26707251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for spontaneous bladder perforation after augmentation cystoplasty.
DeFoor W; Tackett L; Minevich E; Wacksman J; Sheldon C
Urology; 2003 Oct; 62(4):737-41. PubMed ID: 14550454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-Term Outcomes of Bladder Neck Reconstruction without Augmentation Cystoplasty in Children.
Grimsby GM; Menon V; Schlomer BJ; Baker LA; Adams R; Gargollo PC; Jacobs MA
J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 26173106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical indications for augmentation in children with neurogenic urinary incontinence following bladder outlet procedures: Results of a 14-year observational study.
Snodgrass W; Granberg C
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Feb; 12(1):46.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26429598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bladder augmentation and artificial sphincter implantation: urodynamic behavior and effects on continence.
Rodó JS; Cáceres FA; Lerena JR; Rossy E
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Feb; 4(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18631885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of seromuscular bladder augmentation versus standard ileocystoplasty: A single institution experience over 14 years.
Odeh RI; Farhat WA; Penna FJ; Koyle MA; Lee LC; Butt H; Alyami FA
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):200.e1-200.e5. PubMed ID: 27576595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prerequisite for successful surgical outcome in urothelium lined seromuscular colocystoplasty.
Jung HJ; Lee H; Im YJ; Lee YS; Hong CH; Han SW
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1416-21. PubMed ID: 22341808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of lower urinary and bowel function in meningomyelocele patients with augmentation enterocystoplasty.
Mitsui T; Tanaka H; Moriya K; Matsuda M; Nonomura K
Spinal Cord; 2008 Jun; 46(6):432-7. PubMed ID: 18317489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urodynamic and imaging findings in infants with myelomeningocele may predict need for future augmentation cystoplasty.
Corona LE; Lee T; Marchetti K; S Streur C; Ivancic V; Kraft KH; Bloom DA; Wan J; Park JM
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):644.e1-644.e5. PubMed ID: 31653462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the type of bladder augmentation influence the resolution of pre-existing vesicoureteral reflux? Urodynamic studies.
Juhasz Z; Somogyi R; Vajda P; Oberritter Z; Fathi K; Pinter AB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 17985371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Augmenting the augmented bladder: treatment of the contractile bowel segment.
Pope JC; Keating MA; Casale AJ; Rink RC
J Urol; 1998 Sep; 160(3 Pt 1):854-7. PubMed ID: 9720575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bladder augmentation and replacement. Urodynamic and clinical review of 25 patients.
Robertson AS; Davies JB; Webb RJ; Neal DE
Br J Urol; 1991 Dec; 68(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 1773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
