210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38730312)
21. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used industrially for bioethanol production.
Jacobus AP; Gross J; Evans JH; Ceccato-Antonini SR; Gombert AK
Essays Biochem; 2021 Jul; 65(2):147-161. PubMed ID: 34156078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening novel genes by a comprehensive strategy to construct multiple stress-tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae with prominent bioethanol production.
Wang L; Li B; Su RR; Wang SP; Xia ZY; Xie CY; Tang YQ
Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod; 2022 Jan; 15(1):11. PubMed ID: 35418148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A synthetic medium to simulate sugarcane molasses.
Lino FSO; Basso TO; Sommer MOA
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2018; 11():221. PubMed ID: 30127851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of multiple inhibitor tolerant yeast via adaptive laboratory evolution for sustainable bioethanol production.
Hemansi ; Himanshu ; Patel AK; Saini JK; Singhania RR
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Jan; 344(Pt B):126247. PubMed ID: 34740795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production.
Ruyters S; Mukherjee V; Verstrepen KJ; Thevelein JM; Willems KA; Lievens B
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 25413210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Bassi AP; da Silva JC; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1661-76. PubMed ID: 23536198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-Term Adaption to High Osmotic Stress as a Tool for Improving Enological Characteristics in Industrial Wine Yeast.
Betlej G; Bator E; Oklejewicz B; Potocki L; Górka A; Slowik-Borowiec M; Czarny W; Domka W; Kwiatkowska A
Genes (Basel); 2020 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 32443892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Over-expression of Isu1p and Jac1p increases the ethanol tolerance and yield by superoxide and iron homeostasis mechanism in an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast.
Martínez-Alcántar L; Madrigal A; Sánchez-Briones L; Díaz-Pérez AL; López-Bucio JS; Campos-García J
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 46(7):925-936. PubMed ID: 30963327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mitigating stress in industrial yeasts.
Walker GM; Basso TO
Fungal Biol; 2020 May; 124(5):387-397. PubMed ID: 32389301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved Sugarcane-Based Fermentation Processes by an Industrial Fuel-Ethanol Yeast Strain.
Muller G; de Godoy VR; Dário MG; Duval EH; Alves-Jr SL; Bücker A; Rosa CA; Dunn B; Sherlock G; Stambuk BU
J Fungi (Basel); 2023 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 37623574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo evolutionary engineering for ethanol-tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid cells triggers diploidization.
Turanlı-Yıldız B; Benbadis L; Alkım C; Sezgin T; Akşit A; Gökçe A; Öztürk Y; Baykal AT; Çakar ZP; François JM
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Sep; 124(3):309-318. PubMed ID: 28552194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production.
Demeke MM; Dumortier F; Li Y; Broeckx T; Foulquié-Moreno MR; Thevelein JM
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2013 Aug; 6(1):120. PubMed ID: 23971950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cell recycling during repeated very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations using the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PE-2.
Pereira FB; Gomes DG; Guimarães PM; Teixeira JA; Domingues L
Biotechnol Lett; 2012 Jan; 34(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21898130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
Mo W; Wang M; Zhan R; Yu Y; He Y; Lu H
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2019; 12():63. PubMed ID: 30949239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adaptive laboratory evolution to obtain furfural tolerant
Yao L; Jia Y; Zhang Q; Zheng X; Yang H; Dai J; Chen X
Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1333777. PubMed ID: 38239732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New biomarkers underlying acetic acid tolerance in the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii.
Samakkarn W; Vandecruys P; Moreno MRF; Thevelein J; Ratanakhanokchai K; Soontorngun N
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2024 Jan; 108(1):153. PubMed ID: 38240846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell membrane components and promotion to ethanol tolerance during the bioethanol fermentation.
Dong SJ; Yi CF; Li H
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2015 Dec; 69():196-203. PubMed ID: 26515124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fermentative and growth performances of Dekkera bruxellensis in different batch systems and the effect of initial low cell counts in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Meneghin MC; Bassi AP; Codato CB; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Yeast; 2013 Aug; 30(8):295-305. PubMed ID: 23658026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transcriptional profiling of Brazilian Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains selected for semi-continuous fermentation of sugarcane must.
Brown NA; de Castro PA; de Castro Pimentel Figueiredo B; Savoldi M; Buckeridge MS; Lopes ML; de Lima Paullilo SC; Borges EP; Amorim HV; Goldman MH; Bonatto D; Malavazi I; Goldman GH
FEMS Yeast Res; 2013 May; 13(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 23360418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nutrient Signaling via the TORC1-Greatwall-PP2A
Watanabe D; Kajihara T; Sugimoto Y; Takagi K; Mizuno M; Zhou Y; Chen J; Takeda K; Tatebe H; Shiozaki K; Nakazawa N; Izawa S; Akao T; Shimoi H; Maeda T; Takagi H
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 85(1):. PubMed ID: 30341081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
