These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38730400)

  • 1. Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study.
    Basheer RR; Hasanain FA; Abuelenain DA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):546. PubMed ID: 38730400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15241907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study.
    Biçer Z; Yaman BC; Çeliksöz Ö; Tepe H
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):876. PubMed ID: 39095862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
    Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite.
    Yuan H; Li M; Guo B; Gao Y; Liu H; Li J
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):535-43. PubMed ID: 26734678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties.
    Souza RO; Ozcan M; Michida SM; de Melo RM; Pavanelli CA; Bottino MA; Soares LE; Martin AA
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 20040031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of composite materials used for bracket bonding.
    Gama AC; Moraes AG; Yamasaki LC; Loguercio AD; Carvalho CN; Bauer J
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 23969920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the impact of flowable composite liner on the fracture strength and microleakage of large composite resin restorations of primary anterior teeth.
    Kalakijuybari FZ; Pasdar N; Ahmadi G; Seyedmajidi A
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 24(4):473-479. PubMed ID: 37341920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study.
    Reddy SN; Jayashankar DN; Nainan M; Shivanna V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23579894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Flexural Properties of Bulk-fill Restorative/Flowable Composites and Their Conventional Counterparts.
    Eweis AH; Yap AU; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 31034352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins.
    Stawarczyk B; Egli R; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):386-98. PubMed ID: 22133396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles.
    Hosseinalipour M; Javadpour J; Rezaie H; Dadras T; Hayati AN
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.