These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38731150)

  • 1. Comparison of Force Distribution during Laryngoscopy with the C-MAC D-BLADE and Macintosh-Style Blades: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Schmutz A; Breddin I; Draxler R; Schumann S; Spaeth J
    J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect videolaryngoscopy using Macintosh blades in patients with non-anticipated difficult airways results in significantly lower forces exerted on teeth relative to classic direct laryngoscopy: a randomized crossover trial.
    Pieters B; Maassen R; Van Eig E; Maathuis B; Van Den Dobbelsteen J; Van Zundert A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Aug; 81(8):846-54. PubMed ID: 25311949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic review of meta-analyses comparing direct laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopy.
    Downey AW; Duggan LV; Law JA
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 May; 68(5):706-714. PubMed ID: 33512660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective Trial to Compare Direct and Indirect Laryngoscopy Using C-MAC PM® with Macintosh Blade and D-Blade® in a Simulated Difficult Airway.
    Raimann FJ; Dietze PE; Cuca CE; Meininger D; Kessler P; Byhahn C; Gill-Schuster D; Zacharowski K; Mutlak H
    Emerg Med Int; 2019; 2019():1067473. PubMed ID: 31065384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
    Rajagopal S; Gardner RN; Swanson E; Kim S; Sondekoppam R; Ueda K; Hanada S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50523. PubMed ID: 38222170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Wieringa PA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22091734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope for Intubation in the Operating Room: A Comparative Quality Improvement Project.
    De Jong A; Pouzeratte Y; Laplace A; Normanno M; Rollé A; Verzilli D; Perrigault PF; Colson P; Capdevila X; Molinari N; Jaber S
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Feb; 132(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32739955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.
    Passi Y; Sathyamoorthy M; Lerman J; Heard C; Marino M
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 25062740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study.
    Healy DW; Picton P; Morris M; Turner C
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Jun; 12():11. PubMed ID: 22720884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.
    McCoy EP; Mirakhur RK; Rafferty C; Bunting H; Austin BA
    Anaesthesia; 1996 Oct; 51(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 8984862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?
    Varghese E; Kundu R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 24690084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study.
    Sinha R; Ray BR; Sharma A; Pandey RK; Punj J; Darlong V; Trikha A
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 31920236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
    Paik H; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial comparing nociception level (NOL) index, blood pressure, and heart rate responses to direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for intubation: the NOLint project.
    Sbeghen V; Verdonck O; McDevitt J; Zaphiratos V; Brulotte V; Loubert C; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Belanger ME; Fortier LP; Godin N; Guertin MC; Fortier A; Richebé P
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 Jun; 68(6):855-867. PubMed ID: 33709262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia.
    Cavus E; Thee C; Moeller T; Kieckhaefer J; Doerges V; Wagner K
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2011 Mar; 11():6. PubMed ID: 21362173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of forces acting on maxillary incisors during tracheal intubation with different laryngoscopy techniques: a blinded manikin study.
    Schieren M; Kleinschmidt J; Schmutz A; Loop T; Staat M; Gatzweiler KH; Wappler F; Defosse J
    Anaesthesia; 2019 Dec; 74(12):1563-1571. PubMed ID: 31448404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro assessment of light intensity provided during direct laryngeal visualization by videolaryngoscopes with Macintosh geometry blades.
    Harlow M; Kovacs G; Brousseau P; Law JA
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 Dec; 68(12):1779-1788. PubMed ID: 34498231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applied forces with direct versus indirect laryngoscopy in neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study.
    Cavallin F; Sala C; Maglio S; Bua B; Villani PE; Menciassi A; Tognarelli S; Trevisanuto D
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 May; 70(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 36788198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.