129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38733417)
1. FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious??
Bassetty KC; Begum D; Barmon D; Baruah U; Gupta S; Kumar M; Nath J; Khanikar D; Bhattacharyya M; Roy PS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 150(5):251. PubMed ID: 38733417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):383-394. PubMed ID: 37337978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 34(5):e85. PubMed ID: 37593813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered?
Abu-Rustum NR; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Alektiar KM; Leitao MM; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Soslow R; Hensley M; Barakat RR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Apr; 21(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 21436699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the 2009 FIGO staging system really valuable for stage I endometrial cancer?
Atalay F; Cetinkaya K; Bacinoglu A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(6):556-8. PubMed ID: 24601051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The right time for change: A report on the heterogeneity of IVB endometrial cancer and improved risk-stratification provided by new 2023 FIGO staging criteria.
Haight PJ; Riedinger CJ; Backes FJ; O'Malley DM; Cosgrove CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 175():32-40. PubMed ID: 37321153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic performance of the 2023 FIGO staging schema for endometrial cancer.
Matsuo K; Chen L; Klar M; Lee MW; Machida H; Mikami M; Muderspach LI; Carlson JW; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 187():37-45. PubMed ID: 38713997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer.
Gravbrot N; Weil CR; DeCesaris CM; Gaffney DK; Suneja G; Burt LM
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113913. PubMed ID: 38377777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.
Tangjitgamol S; Srijaipracharoen S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradool K; Thavaramara T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 23745302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance staging accuracy for endometrial carcinoma based on different FIGO staging systems].
Zhang YL; Ding GJ; Shi L; Chen YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 93(19):1486-9. PubMed ID: 24029574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic significance of surgical staging for carcinoma of the endometrium.
Wolfson AH; Sightler SE; Markoe AM; Schwade JG; Averette HE; Ganjei P; Hilsenbeck SG
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 May; 45(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1592280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of tumor size as staging variable in the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I leiomyosarcoma: a population-based study.
Garg G; Shah JP; Liu JR; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Munkarah A; Morris RT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20940535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
