These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38733653)

  • 1. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Bali AS; Basu N; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112048. PubMed ID: 38733653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Basu N; Bali AS; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Dec; 341():111499. PubMed ID: 36283276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners' responses.
    Basu N; Weber P; Bali AS; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111768. PubMed ID: 37392611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():30-40. PubMed ID: 28575731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Approach to Speaker Identification.
    Hollien H
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):334-344. PubMed ID: 27404606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings.
    Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29291950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case for aural perceptual speaker identification.
    Hollien H; Didla G; Harnsberger JD; Hollien KA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():8-20. PubMed ID: 27855301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies.
    Morrison GS; Sahito FH; Jardine G; Djokic D; Clavet S; Berghs S; Goemans Dorny C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():92-100. PubMed ID: 27100858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Hughes V; Jessen M; Meuwly D; Neumann C; Planting S; Thompson WC; van der Vloed D; Ypma RJF; Zhang C; Anonymous A; Anonymous B
    Sci Justice; 2021 May; 61(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 33985678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validations of an alpha version of the E
    Weber P; Enzinger E; Labrador B; Lozano-Díez A; Ramos D; González-Rodríguez J; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100223. PubMed ID: 35281657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Euclidean Distances as measures of speaker similarity including identical twin pairs: A forensic investigation using source and filter voice characteristics.
    San Segundo E; Tsanas A; Gómez-Vilda P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():25-38. PubMed ID: 27912151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whose voice is that?
    Rogers N
    Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6278):1140. PubMed ID: 26965606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The use of the functional dynamic complex of verbal skills for the purpose of forensic medical personality identification of the speaker].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 23789408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Voice identification in the Dr. Schneider case. Problems in speaker identification by lay persons].
    Künzel HJ
    Arch Kriminol; 1996; 198(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 8967825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition.
    Zhang C; Tan T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):118-22. PubMed ID: 17646071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison.
    Leemann A; Kolly MJ; Dellwo V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():59-67. PubMed ID: 24675042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test of the effectiveness of speaker verification for differentiating between identical twins.
    Ariyaeeinia A; Morrison C; Malegaonkar A; Black S
    Sci Justice; 2008 Dec; 48(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 19192680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.