133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38734231)
1. Impact of the Dobbs decision on abortion services from a large tertiary center in Oregon.
Mandelbaum AD; Nacev EC; Fuerst MF; Colwill A; Ramanadhan S; Rodriguez M
Contraception; 2024 May; ():110484. PubMed ID: 38734231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in interstate abortion travel to Oregon following the Dobbs court decision.
Fuerst M; Mandelbaum A; Nacev E; Rodriguez M
Contraception; 2024 Jun; ():110520. PubMed ID: 38897431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.
Bergman ME; Gaskins VA; Allen T; Cheung HK; Hebl M; King EB; Sinclair RR; Siuta RL; Wolfe C; Zelin AI
Occup Health Sci; 2023; 7(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 36843836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
Pierson BC; Banaag A; Janvrin ML; Koehlmoos TP
Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38762601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.
Willis MD; Hoffman MN; Wang TR; Sabbath EL; Kuriyama AS; Wesselink AK; Wise LA
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.
Swanson K; Ravi A; Saleh S; Weia B; Pleasants E; Arvisais-Anhalt S
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46655. PubMed ID: 37171873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of post-Dobbs abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeast: a qualitative study.
Schultz A; Smith C; Johnson M; Bryant A; Buchbinder M
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 May; 6(7):101387. PubMed ID: 38772442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Watching the fall of Roe v. Wade: Media exposure relates to U.S. women's alcohol use intentions.
Post SM; Jobe MC; Malekzadeh AN; AuBuchon KE; Hoffman RK; Stock ML; Bowleg L
Psychol Addict Behav; 2024 Mar; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 37676169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.
Bole R; Lundy SD; Pei E; Bajic P; Parekh N; Vij SC
Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; 36(3):265-268. PubMed ID: 36788351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early national trends in non-abortion reproductive care access after
Zhao J; Zahn A; Pang SC; Quang TS; Campbell J; Halkitis PN
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1309068. PubMed ID: 38525331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
