These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38734299)
1. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series. Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study. Li J; Dai M; Wang S; Zhang X; Fan Q; Chen L J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105218. PubMed ID: 38955260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series. Yang S; Chen J; Li A; Deng K; Li P; Xu S J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104451. PubMed ID: 36781099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study. Feng Y; Su Z; Mo A; Yang X Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Dec; 8(1):65. PubMed ID: 36512162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical Accuracy Assessment of Robotically Assisted Dental Implant Surgery for Partially Edentulous Patients: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial. Klass D; Price A; DiBattista M; Dibart S; Kernitsky J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Aug; 39(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 37910832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study. Chen Z; Li J; Sinjab K; Mendonca G; Yu H; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 30346631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study. Zhang S; Cai Q; Chen W; Lin Y; Gao Y; Wu D; Chen J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 38033198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wu XY; Shi JY; Qiao SC; Tonetti MS; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; 35(6):598-608. PubMed ID: 38517053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]