These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38734486)
1. Do strength of zirconia-abutment-interfaces depend on cement, zirconia type and titanium abutment dimensions? Alic Z; Vaskovich T; Franz A; Lettner S; Moritz A; Watts DC; Schedle A Dent Mater; 2024 Jun; 40(6):879-888. PubMed ID: 38734486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study. Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases. Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pull-off Force of Four Different Implant Cements Between Zirconia Crowns and Titanium Implant Abutments in Two Different Abutment Heights. Volkmann H; Rauch A; Koenig A; Schierz O Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(3):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 35472113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments. Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro assessment of the effect of luting agents, abutment height, and fatigue on the retention of zirconia crowns luted to titanium base implant abutments. Strazzi-Sahyon HB; Bergamo ETP; Gierthmuehlen PC; Lopes ACO; Alves LMM; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Zahoui A; Coelho PG; de Carvalho AM; Bonfante EA J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):739.e1-739.e8. PubMed ID: 37684141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cementation Protocol for Bonding Zirconia Crowns to Titanium Base CAD/CAM Abutments. Zahoui A; Bergamo ET; Marun MM; Silva KP; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):527-535. PubMed ID: 32956434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations. Wadhwani C; Chung KH J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants. Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations. Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study. Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns. Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments. Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the residual cement on custom computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconia abutments: A preliminary cohort study. Hsu KW; Liang CH; Peng YC; Hsiao CC J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 34521506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. Son YH; Han CH; Kim S J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants. Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]