These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38734597)
1. Accuracy of the novel digital non-cross-arch surgical guides with integration of tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support for implant placement in mandibular free-end. Wu Q; Lou Y; Sun J; Xie C; Wu J; Yu H BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):550. PubMed ID: 38734597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of implant placement using CAD-CAM tooth-supported surgical guides for an auricular prosthesis in vitro. Fan Y; Wei H; Zhao R; Lin X; Bai S J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 36710294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fixation Pins Increase the Accuracy of Implant Surgery in Free-End Models: An In Vitro Study. Chen X; Yang Z; Wang Y; Fu G J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 81(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 36716792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retentive design of a small surgical guide for implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Kobe T; Fidler A; Kuralt M; Gašpirc B; Gašperšič R J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104384. PubMed ID: 36470471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Aggarwal S; Aggarwal S; Goswami R; Mowar A; Tomar N; Saxena D J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 37929366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. Park C; Raigrodski AJ; Rosen J; Spiekerman C; London RM J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 19463664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study. Wang ZY; Chao JR; Zheng JW; You M; Liu Y; Shen JF J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103882. PubMed ID: 34742831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides with cylindrical versus C-shaped guiding holes: A split-mouth clinical study. Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; El-Sharkawy AM J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 32389377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of implant diameter on accuracy of static implant guided surgery: An in vitro study. Thanasrisuebwong P; Kulchotirat T; Hopfensperger LJ; Bencharit S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 36470759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of guide stabilizers and their application sequences on trueness and precision of surgical guides in free end situations: An in vitro analysis. Liu R; Xia R; Zhang L; Gan X; Li C; Liu Q; Chen Z; Chen Z Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 38112164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]