126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38735468)
1. Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches.
Rutkūnas V; Jegelevičius D; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis L; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M; Husain NA; Akulauskas M; Pletkus J
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105050. PubMed ID: 38735468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.
Meneghetti PC; Li J; Borella PS; Mendonça G; Burnett LH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295790. PubMed ID: 38113200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.
Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study.
Hamilton A; Negreiros WM; Jain S; Finkelman M; Gallucci GO
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; 35(6):641-651. PubMed ID: 38567801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.
Ashraf Y; Abo El Fadl A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 37310208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis.
Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study.
Canullo L; Pesce P; Caponio VCA; Iacono R; Luciani FS; Raffone C; Menini M
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104979. PubMed ID: 38556193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study.
El Osta N; Drancourt N; Auduc C; Veyrune JL; Nicolas E
J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104892. PubMed ID: 38367825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
