153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38737126)
1. Genomic prediction based on a joint reference population for the Xinjiang Brown cattle.
Zhang M; Xu L; Lu H; Luo H; Zhou J; Wang D; Zhang X; Huang X; Wang Y
Front Genet; 2024; 15():1394636. PubMed ID: 38737126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.
Kemper KE; Reich CM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Chamberlain AJ; Mason BA; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):29. PubMed ID: 25887988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models.
Ma H; Li H; Ge F; Zhao H; Zhu B; Zhang L; Gao H; Xu L; Li J; Wang Z
Genes (Basel); 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38397242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Single-Breed and Multi-Breed Training Populations for Infrared Predictions of Novel Phenotypes in Holstein Cows.
Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Morota G; Peñagaricano F; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
Animals (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34359121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistency of linkage disequilibrium between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and genomic prediction for Chinese Holsteins using a joint reference population.
Zhou L; Ding X; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Mar; 45(1):7. PubMed ID: 23516992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.
Zhang M; Luo H; Xu L; Shi Y; Zhou J; Wang D; Zhang X; Huang X; Wang Y
Animals (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35049759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of genomic prediction for milk fatty acid composition by using a multi-population reference and incorporating GWAS results.
Gebreyesus G; Bovenhuis H; Lund MS; Poulsen NA; Sun D; Buitenhuis B
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):16. PubMed ID: 31029078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.
Karoui S; Carabaño MJ; Díaz C; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):39. PubMed ID: 23216664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.
Al-Khudhair A; VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Li B
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4478-4485. PubMed ID: 33612229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Study of Bacterial Microbiota Differences in the Rumen and Feces of Xinjiang Brown and Holstein Cattle.
Lu H; Chen S; Li F; Zhang G; Geng J; Zhang M; Huang X; Wang Y
Animals (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38929367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of meta-analyses and joint analyses to select variants in whole genome sequences for genomic evaluation: An application in milk production of French dairy cattle breeds.
Teissier M; Sanchez MP; Boussaha M; Barbat A; Hoze C; Robert-Granie C; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3126-3139. PubMed ID: 29428760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.
Li X; Wang S; Huang J; Li L; Zhang Q; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):66. PubMed ID: 25315995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.
van den Berg I; Meuwissen THE; MacLeod IM; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3155-3174. PubMed ID: 30738664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
