These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38737241)

  • 1. Prevention of food fraud and fraud emulation among companies in the supply chain based on a social Co-governance framework.
    Wu L; Tang H; Dai X; Chen X; Zhang J
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e30340. PubMed ID: 38737241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Food manufacturer willingness to employ blockchain technology system under the social Co-governance framework: China's situation.
    Wu L; Chen J; Dai X; Chen X; Zhang J
    Curr Res Food Sci; 2023; 7():100619. PubMed ID: 37920442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective.
    Niu L; Chen M; Chen X; Wu L; Tsai FS
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():752112. PubMed ID: 34869168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safe Food Supply Chain as Health Network: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Behavior Strategy for Quality Investment.
    Wu L; Ling Z; Zhang J; Dai X; Chen X
    Inquiry; 2024; 61():469580241244728. PubMed ID: 38706193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Do Spillover Effects Influence the Food Safety Strategies of Companies? New Orientation of Regulations for Food Safety.
    Xue Y; Geng X; Kiprop E; Hong M
    Foods; 2021 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33670771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A tripartite evolutionary game study on green governance in China's coating industry.
    Wei'an L; Yin M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(40):61161-61177. PubMed ID: 35438403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.
    Kendall H; Naughton P; Kuznesof S; Raley M; Dean M; Clark B; Stolz H; Home R; Chan MY; Zhong Q; Brereton P; Frewer LJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0195817. PubMed ID: 29791434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study on the effect of income perception on cleaner-production fraud.
    Liu M; Li Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(29):44638-44652. PubMed ID: 35137314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Healthcare Fraud Supervision under the Government Reward and Punishment Mechanism.
    Zhu C; Zhou L; Zhang X; Walsh CA
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Jul; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 37444806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study on the path of governance in health insurance fraud considering moral hazard.
    Liu J; Wang Y; Yu J
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1199912. PubMed ID: 37790723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary game of inland shipping pollution control under government co-supervision.
    Xu L; Di Z; Chen J
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Oct; 171():112730. PubMed ID: 34303057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Evolutionary Game Analysis of Low Carbon Production Behaviour of Farmers, Government and Consumers in Food Safety Source Governance.
    Xie Y; Su Y; Li F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drugs quality supervision strategy of different distribution channels in pharmaceutical supply chain.
    Zhang S; Zhu L
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():954371. PubMed ID: 36304253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Food fraud threats in UK post-harvest seafood supply chains; an assessment of current vulnerabilities.
    Lawrence S; Elliott C; Huisman W; Dean M; van Ruth S
    NPJ Sci Food; 2024 May; 8(1):30. PubMed ID: 38802407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A sense of ginger fraud: prevalence and deconstruction of the China-European union supply chain.
    Han Q; Erasmus SW; Elliott CT; van Ruth SM
    NPJ Sci Food; 2022 Nov; 6(1):51. PubMed ID: 36329117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How can blockchain technology promote food safety in agricultural market?-an evolutionary game analysis.
    Bai Y; Yang Z; Huang M; Hu M; Chen S; Luo J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(40):93179-93198. PubMed ID: 37507559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Authenticity of food products in the Polish market checked during 2005-2012.
    Kowalczyk S
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2015; 66(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 25813070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food Credence Attributes: A Conceptual Framework of Supply Chain Stakeholders, Their Motives, and Mechanisms to Address Information Asymmetry.
    Schrobback P; Zhang A; Loechel B; Ricketts K; Ingham A
    Foods; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36766068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Food fraud and mitigating strategies of UK food supply chain during COVID-19.
    Soon-Sinclair JM; Nyarugwe S; Jack L
    Food Control; 2023 Jun; 148():109670. PubMed ID: 36748095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment in the Chinese Baijiu Supply Chain.
    Wang Y; Liu J; Xiong Y; Liu X; Wen X
    Foods; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36766045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.