These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38739287)

  • 1. Practice-induced SNARC: evidence from a null-SNARC sample.
    Palaz E; Çetinkaya H; Tuncali Z; Kamar B; Dural S
    Cogn Process; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38739287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.
    Feldman A; Oscar-Strom Y; Tzelgov J; Berger A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 May; 181():102-109. PubMed ID: 30735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.
    Prete G; Tommasi L
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9155. PubMed ID: 32435547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters.
    Riello M; Rusconi E
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():372. PubMed ID: 22207856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The SNARC Effect in Number Memorization and Retrieval. What is the Impact of Congruency, Magnitude and the Exact Position of Numbers in Short-Term Memory Processing?
    Gut M; Staniszewski R
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2016; 12(4):193-208. PubMed ID: 28154615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design.
    Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():654. PubMed ID: 29217996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.
    Wang Q; Liu M; Shi W; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1558. PubMed ID: 30186215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Scozia G; D'Onofrio M; Raffa G; Nigro S; Arnaud CR; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Apr; 154():107773. PubMed ID: 33567295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.
    Aleotti S; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 35960336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numbers in Action.
    Rugani R; Sartori L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():388. PubMed ID: 27524965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical time course of right frontoparietal involvement in mental number space.
    Rusconi E; Dervinis M; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):465-83. PubMed ID: 23163421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial Presentations, but Not Response Formats Influence Spatial-Numerical Associations in Adults.
    Fischer U; Huber S; Nuerk HC; Cress U; Moeller K
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2608. PubMed ID: 30619009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993).
    Wood G; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2006 Nov; 42(8):1069-79; discussion 1119-23. PubMed ID: 17209413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain activity underlying response induced by SNARC‑congruent and SNARC‑incongruent stimuli.
    Gut M; Binder M; Finc K; Szeszkowski W
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2021; 81(2):121-140. PubMed ID: 34170260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to cook a SNARC: number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations.
    Fischer MH; Mills RA; Shaki S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 19917517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.