These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38739826)

  • 1. Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study.
    Priyadarshini KS; Nandini VV; Marimuthu R; Lathief J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 34(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 38739826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design parameters of polylactic acid custom trays manufactured by fused deposition modeling for partial edentulism: Consideration of the accuracy of the definitive cast.
    Li H; Ma K; Sun Y; Chen H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):288.e1-288.e11. PubMed ID: 34924189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
    Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial.
    Yang X; Liu Y; Li Y; Zhao Y; Di P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 33593675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of production and clinical working time of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom trays for complete denture].
    Wei L; Chen H; Zhou YS; Sun YC; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 28203010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Implant Impression Accuracy Using Different Trays and Techniques With a 3D Superimposition Method.
    Unsal G; Caglar A; Tural M; Orhan M; Alkan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 0(0):1-19. PubMed ID: 38607357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Ghanem RG; Badr AMI; Agamy EMTM; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 May; 32(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 38691584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
    Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches.
    Liu Y; Di P; Zhao Y; Hao Q; Tian J; Cui H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):1007–1014. PubMed ID: 31107937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.