These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38740270)

  • 1. Performance of HER2 DAKO HercepTest and Ventana 4B5 immunohistochemical assays on detecting HER2 gene-amplification in uterine serous carcinomas.
    Navarro Sanchez JM; Finkelman BS; Tyburski H; Turner BM; Moisini I; Katerji H; Varghese S; Wang X; Schiffhauer LM; Chen JJ; Hicks DG; Zhang H
    Hum Pathol; 2024 Jun; 148():51-59. PubMed ID: 38740270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis, GE001) with Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) in breast cancer: correlation with HER2 amplification and HER2 low status.
    Rüschoff J; Friedrich M; Nagelmeier I; Kirchner M; Andresen LM; Salomon K; Portier B; Sredni ST; Schildhaus HU; Jasani B; Grzelinski M; Viale G
    Virchows Arch; 2022 Nov; 481(5):685-694. PubMed ID: 35970977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Dako HercepTest and Ventana PATHWAY Anti-HER2 (4B5) Tests and Their Correlation With Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinoma.
    Lucas E; Jabbar SB; Molberg K; Fang Y; Xie XJ; Blacketer S; Sahoo S
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019 Jul; 27(6):403-409. PubMed ID: 31233398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
    Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of four immunohistochemical tests and FISH for measuring HER2 expression in gastric carcinomas.
    Cho EY; Srivastava A; Park K; Kim J; Lee MH; Do I; Lee J; Kim KM; Sohn TS; Kang WK; Kim S
    Pathology; 2012 Apr; 44(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22437741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of Her-2/neu oncoprotein overexpression in breast cancer: HercepTest (Dako) for manual testing and Her-2/neuTest 4B5 (Ventana) for Ventana BenchMark automatic staining system with correlation to results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
    Mayr D; Heim S; Werhan C; Zeindl-Eberhart E; Kirchner T
    Virchows Arch; 2009 Mar; 454(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19169706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Dako HercepTest and Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER2 (4B5) tests and their correlation with silver
    Miladinović M; Vučković L; Klisic A
    Open Med (Wars); 2021; 16(1):1503-1512. PubMed ID: 34708154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False positivity in HER2 testing of breast cancer: novel paths for approaching an old dilemma.
    Nunes CB; Rocha RM; Buzelin MA; Balabram D; de Souza Foureaux F; Porto SS; Gobbi H
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):946-50. PubMed ID: 23867547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HER2 in gastric cancer: comparative analysis of three different antibodies using whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays.
    Abrahão-Machado LF; Jácome AA; Wohnrath DR; dos Santos JS; Carneseca EC; Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo-Neto C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 19(38):6438-46. PubMed ID: 24151362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IHC for Her2 with CBE356 antibody is a more accurate predictor of Her2 gene amplification by FISH than HercepTest in breast carcinoma.
    Ainsworth R; Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Forsyth A; Richmond J; Angerson W; Watters A; Dunne B
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1086-90. PubMed ID: 16189156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?
    Barrett C; Magee H; O'Toole D; Daly S; Jeffers M
    J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 16822876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HER2-testing in 538 consecutive breast cancer cases using FISH and immunohistochemistry.
    Kovács A; Stenman G
    Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jan; 206(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 19819642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver and Interantibody Reproducibility of HER2 Immunohistochemical Scoring in an Enriched HER2-Low-Expressing Breast Cancer Cohort.
    Karakas C; Tyburski H; Turner BM; Wang X; Schiffhauer LM; Katerji H; Hicks DG; Zhang H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2023 May; 159(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 36856777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), a second-generation irreversible pan-erbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrates remarkable activity against HER2-amplified uterine serous endometrial cancer in vitro.
    Zhu L; Lopez S; Bellone S; Black J; Cocco E; Zigras T; Predolini F; Bonazzoli E; Bussi B; Stuhmer Z; Schwab CL; English DP; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Azodi M; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Santin AD
    Tumour Biol; 2015 Jul; 36(7):5505-13. PubMed ID: 25669172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HER2 immunohistochemistry significantly overestimates HER2 amplification in uterine papillary serous carcinomas.
    Mentrikoski MJ; Stoler MH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 24698965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinoma: discordance between antibodies and with in-situ hybridisation.
    Koopman T; van der Vegt B; Dijkstra M; Bart J; Duiker E; Wisman GBA; de Bock GH; Hollema H
    Histopathology; 2018 Nov; 73(5):852-863. PubMed ID: 29989198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility.
    Powell WC; Hicks DG; Prescott N; Tarr SM; Laniauskas S; Williams T; Short S; Pettay J; Nagle RB; Dabbs DJ; Scott KM; Brown RW; Grogan T; Roche PC; Tubbs RR
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 17536315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HER2 status in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas assessed by two rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP3 and 4B5) and two in situ hybridization methods (FISH and SISH).
    Boers JE; Meeuwissen H; Methorst N
    Histopathology; 2011 Feb; 58(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 21323962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.
    Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Watters AD; Reeves JR; Stanton P; Richmond J; Donald B; Ferrier R; Cooke TG
    J Pathol; 2001 Nov; 195(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 11745673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HER-2 Amplification in Uterine Serous Carcinoma and Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma.
    Banet N; Shahi M; Batista D; Yonescu R; Tanner EJ; Fader AN; Cimino-Mathews A
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 May; 45(5):708-715. PubMed ID: 33739786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.