These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38740690)

  • 1. Correction: Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.
    Nack CA; Yu-Chin C
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38740690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.
    Nack CA; Yu-Chin C
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.
    Bejjani C; Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1622-1637. PubMed ID: 34694824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1950-1960. PubMed ID: 28406686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Stimulus set and response set in task switching: a comparison using ERP].
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Dec; 79(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 19172908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bivalent task switching and memory load: Similar costs on reaction times, different costs on concurrent timing.
    Viau-Quesnel C; Fortin C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 25383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 20(4):757-782. PubMed ID: 32495271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.
    Camos V; Portrat S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25421406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Cognitive Load in Intentional Forgetting Using the Think/No-Think Task.
    Noreen S; de Fockert JW
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 28219259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.
    Bojko A; Kramer AF; Peterson MS
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):226-34. PubMed ID: 15065948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When motion improves working memory.
    Plancher G; Mazeres F; Vallet GT
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):410-416. PubMed ID: 30403919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task foreknowledge swallows item-specific but not list-wide control learning effects.
    Yu-Chin C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):776-792. PubMed ID: 36201805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Switch-related and general preparation processes in task-switching: evidence from multivariate pattern classification of EEG data.
    Mansfield EL; Karayanidis F; Cohen MX
    J Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 32(50):18253-8. PubMed ID: 23238739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective memory and divided attention.
    Otani H; Landau JD; Libkuman TM; St Louis JP; Kazen JK; Throne GW
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 9231147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance.
    Helton WS; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 23143034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent working memory task increases or decreases the flanker-related N2 amplitude.
    Wei H; Yao Y; Zhou L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():962153. PubMed ID: 36160541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention and the readiness for action.
    Baker KS; Mattingley JB; Chambers CD; Cunnington R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3303-13. PubMed ID: 21856320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.