155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38740835)
1. Hypertonic saline- and detergent-accelerated EDTA-based decalcification better preserves mRNA of bones.
Li Z; Wenhart C; Reimann A; Cho YL; Adler K; Muench G
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10888. PubMed ID: 38740835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier.
Alers JC; Krijtenburg PJ; Vissers KJ; van Dekken H
J Histochem Cytochem; 1999 May; 47(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 10219063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in ammonium hydroxide for reducing decalcification time.
Sanderson C; Radley K; Mayton L
Biotech Histochem; 1995 Jan; 70(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7540046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of collagen type II in osteochondral sections by comparing decalcification and antigen retrieval agent combinations.
Amirtham SM; Ozbey O; Kachroo U; Ramasamy B; Vinod E
Clin Anat; 2020 Apr; 33(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 31381185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of tissue decalcification on mRNA retention within bone for in-situ hybridization studies.
Walsh L; Freemont AJ; Hoyland JA
Int J Exp Pathol; 1993 Jun; 74(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 8392858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of three decalcification agents for assessments of cranial fracture histomorphology.
Cornelison JB; Isaac CV; Devota CJ; Billian J; Brown TT; deJong JL; Douglas EA; Fisher-Hubbard AO; Lackey-Cornelison WL; Prahlow JA; Shattuck BL
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 35112350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid decalcification of articular cartilage and subchondral bone using an ultrasonic cleaner with EDTA.
Charnwichai P; Kitkumthorn N; Ruangvejvorachai P; Wongphoom J; Meesakul T; Tammachote N; Tammachote R
Acta Histochem; 2023 Feb; 125(2):152009. PubMed ID: 36724636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Quality Analysis of Bony Specimens for Optimal Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Decalcification.
Craig JC; Freeman M; Walton S; Rogers D; Mehrad M; Gordetsky JB
Int J Surg Pathol; 2022 Dec; 30(8):853-860. PubMed ID: 35343279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of microgravity on collagenase deproteinization and EDTA decalcification of bone fragments.
Simske SJ; Luttges MW
Microgravity Sci Technol; 1994 Sep; 7(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 11541486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Action of EDTA on lipids in human compact bone (author's transl)].
Ngoma Z; Devis R
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1976 Mar; 24(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 819889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies.
Singh VM; Salunga RC; Huang VJ; Tran Y; Erlander M; Plumlee P; Peterson MR
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 23660273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.
Miquelestorena-Standley E; Jourdan ML; Collin C; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Tallegas M; Brulin B; Le Nail LR; Tallet A; Le Loarer F; Massiere J; Galant C; de Pinieux G
Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1505-1517. PubMed ID: 32094425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid decalcification of temporal bones with preservation of ultrastructure.
Madden VJ; Henson MM
Hear Res; 1997 Sep; 111(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 9307313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma.
Washburn E; Tang X; Caruso C; Walls M; Han B
Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():108-114. PubMed ID: 34461131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of a combined method of decalcification compared to EDTA.
Castania VA; Silveira JW; Issy AC; Pitol DL; Castania ML; Neto AD; Bel EA; Defino HL
Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Feb; 78(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 25452153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microwave decalcification of human temporal bones.
Cunningham CD; Schulte BA; Bianchi LM; Weber PC; Schmiedt BN
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 11210875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
