These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The legal status of in vitro embryos. Dickens BM; Cook RJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 20705291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond abortion: why the personhood movement implicates reproductive choice. Will JF Am J Law Med; 2013; 39(4):573-616. PubMed ID: 24494444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo. Cuva AJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional? Schaefer K Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genesis retold: legal issues raised by the cryopreservation of preimplantation human embryos. Saltarelli JJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1985; 36(3):1021-53. PubMed ID: 16086476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining the status of non-transferred embryos in Ireland: a conspectus of case law and implications for clinical IVF practice. Sills ES; Murphy SE Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2009 Jul; 4():8. PubMed ID: 19589140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Embryo Disposition Disputes: Controversies and Case Law. Cohen IG; Adashi EY Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Jul; 46(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 27417864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The present standing of the human embryo in U.S. law. Avila D Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):203-26. PubMed ID: 12854540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research. Bowens KK J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro embryos and DNA profiling: far from clear legal reform. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):15-27. PubMed ID: 15032096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices. Ahnen CD Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use and disposal of stored embryos. Dickens BM Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 27177517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis. Kasimba P Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Restatement (Third) of Torts Section 47(b) Bypasses Traditional Barriers and Offers Aspiring Parents a Clear Path to Recover Stand-Alone NIED when Their Cryopreserved Reproductive Material is Lost or Destroyed. Hnylka JM Am J Law Med; 2020 Nov; 46(4):337-373. PubMed ID: 33413010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the Dobbs decision on in-vitro fertilization and fertility care. Ulker A; Evans MB; Craig LB Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 35(4):306-310. PubMed ID: 37266567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ethical evaluation of the legal status of foetuses and embryos under Chinese law. Raposo VL; Ma Z Dev World Bioeth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 31359558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition. Ziegler M Am Univ Law Rev; 2018; 68(2):515-67. PubMed ID: 30707003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]