These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38744656)

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket axial positioning with and without radiographic support and according to practitioner experience: A three-dimensional study.
    Saliba T; Khoury E; Aboujaoude R; Kassis A
    J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Oct; 13(5):199-210. PubMed ID: 38744656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.
    Aboujaoude R; Kmeid R; Gebrael C; Amm E
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 36058991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation of teeth by conventional panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images - A cross-sectional study.
    Barakaat AA; Maaz M; Sukhia RH; Fida M
    Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100757. PubMed ID: 37163932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effect of using panoramic and cone-beam computed tomography on the accuracy of root position in indirect digital bracket placement: A retrospective study.
    Yilmaz H; Eglenen MN
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Aug; 25(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 34837461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Bouwens DG; Cevidanes L; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 21195286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of various orthodontic materials as foreign bodies via panoramic radiography, cone beam computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Isman O; Isman E
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):524-530. PubMed ID: 34037939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
    Alqareer A; Nada R; Ghayyath A; Baghdady M; Allareddy V
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 34030659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
    Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].
    Lei Q; Zhou L; Lei L; Wang Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 25241531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Anatomical Depictions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Reconstructed Panoramic Projections Compared to Conventional Panoramic Radiographs: A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis.
    Jadhav A; Desai NG; Tadinada A
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44723. PubMed ID: 37809250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of CBCT in Preoperative Assessment of Impacted Canines vs. Panoramic Radiography.
    Alayyash A
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S513-S515. PubMed ID: 38595619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
    Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Measured from Conventional and CBCT Derived Panoramic Radiographs in Orthodontic Patients.
    Nasseh I; Jensen D; Noujeim M
    Open Dent J; 2017; 11():338-349. PubMed ID: 28839482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three Dimensional Evaluation of Accuracy of Bracket Positioning.
    Fafat KKK; Jain D; Pandit SK; Kharbanda R; Trivedy P; Gupta E
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 2):S1188-S1191. PubMed ID: 37693984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
    Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
    Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and head positioning effects on measurements of anterior tooth length using 3-dimensional and conventional dental panoramic radiography.
    Kitai N; Murabayashi M; Sugimoto H; Fujiwara A; Tome W; Katsumata A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):607-615. PubMed ID: 28257745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
    Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bonding.
    Grünheid T; Lee MS; Larson BE
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):468-74. PubMed ID: 26355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.