These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38745297)
1. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study. Li S; Yi C; Yu Z; Wu A; Zhang Y; Lin Y BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):426. PubMed ID: 37370027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study. Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation. Block MS; Emery RW; Cullum DR; Sheikh A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 75(7):1377-1386. PubMed ID: 28384461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study. Geng N; Ren J; Zhang C; Zhou T; Feng C; Chen S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 38336661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study. Jaemsuwan S; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study. Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial. Chandran K R S; Goyal M; Mittal N; George JS J Dent; 2023 Sep; 136():104620. PubMed ID: 37454788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Depth distortion and angular deviation of a fully guided tooth-supported static surgical guide in a partially edentulous patient: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Floriani F; Jurado CA; Cabrera AJ; Duarte W; Porto TS; Afrashtehfar KI J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):10-24. PubMed ID: 38992883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic navigation: a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement. Pellegrino G; Taraschi V; Andrea Z; Ferri A; Marchetti C Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 31134220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study. Li J; Dai M; Wang S; Zhang X; Fan Q; Chen L J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105218. PubMed ID: 38955260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of implant placement using a combination of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: A prospective controlled clinical study. Lorwicheanrung J; Mahardawi B; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):841-853. PubMed ID: 37750503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]