BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38745744)

  • 21. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
    Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wang Y; Li B; Ren F; Song Z; Ouyang L; Liu K
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1236. PubMed ID: 32903313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Laparotomy for Interval Debulking Surgery of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis.
    Zeng S; Yu Y; Cui Y; Liu B; Jin X; Li Z; Liu L
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():900256. PubMed ID: 35924170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.
    Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival After Radical Hysterectomy Followed by Either Adjuvant Chemotherapy or Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Optional Concurrent Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang YF; Fan Y; Zhang P; Ruan JY; Mu Y; Li JK
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():823064. PubMed ID: 35311123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial).
    Tang X; Zhou S; Zhang X; Hua K; He Y; Wang P; Teng Y; Feng W
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1287697. PubMed ID: 38023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Aue-Aungkul A; Kietpeerakool C; Rattanakanokchai S; Galaal K; Temtanakitpaisan T; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 1(1):CD012863. PubMed ID: 33491176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
    Wenzel HHB; Smolders RGV; Beltman JJ; Lambrechts S; Trum HW; Yigit R; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer RP; Mom CH; Bekkers RLM; Lemmens VEPP; Nijman HW; Van der Aa MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 133():14-21. PubMed ID: 32422504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Less extensive surgery for patients with FIGO stage IA2 cervical cancer: A population-based study.
    Du Y; Xu Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Feb; 51(2):102291. PubMed ID: 34915167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
    Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
    Marjoribanks J; Lethaby A; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD003855. PubMed ID: 26820670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.