BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38746948)

  • 1. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Bekisz JM; Boyd CJ; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2024 May; 12(5):e5808. PubMed ID: 38746948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Avila A; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Deldar R; Griffith KF; Willey SC; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):715e-720e. PubMed ID: 33234947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Nipple Necrosis Rates Differ in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Implant-Based Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
    Braun SE; Dreicer M; Butterworth JA; Larson KE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 27(12):4760-4766. PubMed ID: 32699924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nipple necrosis rate with submuscular versus prepectoral implant-based reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy: Does it differ?
    ElSherif A; Bernard S; Djohan R; Atallah A; Tu C; Valente SA
    Am J Surg; 2024 Apr; 230():57-62. PubMed ID: 38071140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ostapenko E; Nixdorf L; Devyatko Y; Exner R; Wimmer K; Fitzal F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36245049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Traditional Subpectoral Technique versus Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Franceschini G; Scardina L; Di Leone A; Terribile DA; Sanchez AM; Magno S; D'Archi S; Franco A; Mason EJ; Carnassale B; Murando F; Orlandi A; Barone Adesi L; Visconti G; Salgarello M; Masetti R
    J Pers Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33671712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.
    Talwar AA; Lanni MA; Ryan IA; Kodali P; Bernstein E; McAuliffe PB; Broach RB; Serletti JM; Butler PD; Fosnot J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):281e-290e. PubMed ID: 37159266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhu L; Liu C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
    Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/ PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
    Kappos EA; Schulz A; Regan MM; Moffa G; Harder Y; Ribi K; Potter S; Pusic AL; Fehr MK; Hemkens LG; Holzbach T; Farhadi J; Simonson C; Knauer M; Verstappen R; Bucher HC; Zwahlen D; Zimmermann F; Schwenkglenks M; Mucklow R; Shaw J; Bjelic-Radisic V; Chiorescu A; Chun YS; Farah S; Xiaosong C; Nigard L; Kuemmel S; Reitsamer R; Hauschild M; Fulco I; Tausch C; Fischer T; Sarlos D; Constantinescu MA; Lupatsch JE; Fitzal F; Heil J; Matrai Z; de Boniface J; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045239. PubMed ID: 34475143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical Delay of Nipple Areola Complex: A Powerful Technique to Extend the Indication of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Loreti A; Fanelli B; Abate O; Spallone D; Arelli F; Bruno E; Marcasciano M; La Pinta M; Meli EZ; Fortunato L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Apr; 23(3):255-264. PubMed ID: 36681577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
    Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.
    Mota BS; Riera R; Ricci MD; Barrett J; de Castria TB; Atallah ÁN; Bevilacqua JL
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD008932. PubMed ID: 27898991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.