These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38747950)

  • 1. Advancement of membrane separation technology for organic pollutant removal.
    Kafle SR; Adhikari S; Shrestha R; Ban S; Khatiwada G; Gaire P; Tuladhar N; Jiang G; Tiwari A
    Water Sci Technol; 2024 May; 89(9):2290-2310. PubMed ID: 38747950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of a combined coagulation and disk filtration process as a pre-treatment to microfiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in a municipal wastewater pilot plant.
    Chon K; Cho J; Kim SJ; Jang A
    Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():20-6. PubMed ID: 25433990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of heavy metals from aluminum anodic oxidation wastewaters by membrane filtration.
    Ates N; Uzal N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):22259-22272. PubMed ID: 29804256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type.
    Kumar M; Adham SS; Pearce WR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):2037-44. PubMed ID: 16570633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of recalcitrant organic matter content in wastewater by means of AOPs aiming industrial water reuse.
    Souza BM; Souza BS; Guimarães TM; Ribeiro TF; Cerqueira AC; Sant'Anna GL; Dezotti M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(22):22947-22956. PubMed ID: 27578092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of microplastic removal from water and wastewater by membrane technologies.
    Acarer S
    Water Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 88(1):199-219. PubMed ID: 37452543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanotechnology-based water treatment strategies.
    Kumar S; Ahlawat W; Bhanjana G; Heydarifard S; Nazhad MM; Dilbaghi N
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Feb; 14(2):1838-58. PubMed ID: 24749460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.
    Haberkamp J; Ernst M; Böckelmann U; Szewzyk U; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3153-61. PubMed ID: 18423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane processing technology in the food industry: food processing, wastewater treatment, and effects on physical, microbiological, organoleptic, and nutritional properties of foods.
    Kotsanopoulos KV; Arvanitoyannis IS
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(9):1147-75. PubMed ID: 24915344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roles of surfactants in pressure-driven membrane separation processes: a review.
    Shi L; Huang J; Zeng G; Zhu L; Gu Y; Shi Y; Yi K; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(30):30731-30754. PubMed ID: 31494849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with membrane separation techniques.
    Zhang L; Weng HX; Chen HL; Gao CJ
    J Environ Sci (China); 2002 Apr; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12046285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Membrane technology for pesticide removal from aquatic environment: Status quo and way forward.
    Goh PS; Ahmad NA; Wong TW; Yogarathinam LT; Ismail AF
    Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 3):136018. PubMed ID: 35973494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanofiltration technology in water treatment and reuse: applications and costs.
    Shahmansouri A; Bellona C
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 25714628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Membrane filtration for tertiary treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry.
    Mänttäri M; Nyström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):99-107. PubMed ID: 17486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.