These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38748313)

  • 1. Influence of CBCT filters and contrast adjustments on peri-implant buccal bone thickness measurement and blooming expression.
    Mello HN; Bonadiman EA; Bruneli GL; Pitol GA; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):315. PubMed ID: 38748313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of probing, ultrasound and cone-beam CT scans for determining the buccal bone plate dimensions around oral implants - A systematic review.
    Dhondt R; Quirynen M; Tarce M; Teughels W; Temmerman A; Jacobs R
    J Periodontal Res; 2022 Aug; 57(4):754-767. PubMed ID: 35612409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices.
    Wanderley VA; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Leite AF; Pauwels R; Shujaat S; Jacobs R; Oliveira ML
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):67. PubMed ID: 34258634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of implant-related characteristics on dental implant blooming: An in vitro study.
    Tarce M; de Greef A; Lahoud P; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1199-1211. PubMed ID: 36189488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.
    Costa JA; Mendes JM; Salazar F; Pacheco JJ; Rompante P; Câmara MI
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 37058184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
    Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
    Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of connective tissue grafting on buccal bone changes based on cone beam computed tomography scans in the esthetic zone of single immediate implants: A 1-year randomized controlled trial.
    Zuiderveld EG; van Nimwegen WG; Meijer HJA; Jung RE; Mühlemann S; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):553-561. PubMed ID: 32918332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurement from cone beam computed tomography compared with histologic analysis.
    Tanaka Y; Dutra V; Lin WS; Levon J; Hamada Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 34756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?
    Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Fontenele RC; Oliveira-Santos N; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5281-5291. PubMed ID: 33625608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.