136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38748373)
21. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.
Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging in a diagnostic algorithm for multiparametric MR mammography.
Vassiou K; Fanariotis M; Tsougos I; Fezoulidis I
Acta Radiol; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1332-1343. PubMed ID: 34605311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?
Li LJ; Yao JY; Zhou XC; Zhao XB; Zhong WJ; Ou B; Luo BM; Hao SY; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 28256344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved characterization of sub-centimeter enhancing breast masses on MRI with radiomics and machine learning in BRCA mutation carriers.
Lo Gullo R; Daimiel I; Rossi Saccarelli C; Bitencourt A; Gibbs P; Fox MJ; Thakur SB; Martinez DF; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; Pinker K
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6721-6731. PubMed ID: 32594207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fully automatic classification of breast lesions on multi-parameter MRI using a radiomics model with minimal number of stable, interpretable features.
Zhang J; Zhan C; Zhang C; Song Y; Yan X; Guo Y; Ai T; Yang G
Radiol Med; 2023 Feb; 128(2):160-170. PubMed ID: 36670236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A New Application of Multimodality Radiomics Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Patients with Microcalcifications-Only in Mammography.
Chen S; Guan X; Shu Z; Li Y; Cao W; Dong F; Zhang M; Shao G; Shao F
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Dec; 25():9786-9793. PubMed ID: 31860635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics and Outcomes of BI-RADS 3 Lesions on Breast MRI.
Panigrahi B; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Falomo E; Di Carlo P; Lee B; Myers KS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):e152-e159. PubMed ID: 30268764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiomics model to classify mammary masses using breast DCE-MRI compared to the BI-RADS classification performance.
Debbi K; Habert P; Grob A; Loundou A; Siles P; Bartoli A; Jacquier A
Insights Imaging; 2023 Apr; 14(1):64. PubMed ID: 37052738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MRI-based radiomics for the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Sha YS; Chen JF
Clin Radiol; 2022 Sep; 77(9):655-663. PubMed ID: 35641339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Color-map virtual touch tissue imaging (CMV) combined with BI-RADS for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Lian KM; Lin T
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 35147574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiomics Based on DCE-MRI Improved Diagnostic Performance Compared to BI-RADS Analysis in Identifying Sclerosing Adenosis of the Breast.
Ruan M; Ding Z; Shan Y; Pan S; Shao C; Xu W; Zhen T; Pang P; Shen Q
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():888141. PubMed ID: 35646630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of initial enhancement analysis using ultra-fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast lesions.
Goto M; Sakai K; Yokota H; Kiba M; Yoshida M; Imai H; Weiland E; Yokota I; Yamada K
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1164-1174. PubMed ID: 30088064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication.
Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Value of sonoelastography for diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions and comparison with BI-RADS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li H; Cong P; Yu YN; Zhang YF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(23):e38425. PubMed ID: 38847732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiomic analysis of HTR-DCE MR sequences improves diagnostic performance compared to BI-RADS analysis of breast MR lesions.
Perre SV; Duron L; Milon A; Bekhouche A; Balvay D; Cornelis FH; Fournier L; Thomassin-Naggara I
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4848-4859. PubMed ID: 33404696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast MRI: does a clinical decision algorithm outweigh reader experience?
Pötsch N; Korajac A; Stelzer P; Kapetas P; Milos RI; Dietzel M; Helbich TH; Clauser P; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6557-6564. PubMed ID: 35852572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The diagnostic value of MRI for architectural distortion categorized as BI-RADS category 3-4 by mammography.
Mei H; Xu J; Yao G; Wang Y
Gland Surg; 2020 Aug; 9(4):1008-1018. PubMed ID: 32953609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
