These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38748935)
1. Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid ultrasound morphology. Moro F; Vagni M; Tran HE; Bernardini F; Mascilini F; Ciccarone F; Nero C; Giannarelli D; Boldrini L; Fagotti A; Scambia G; Valentin L; Testa AC Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38748935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX model: Portuguese multicenter study. Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 64(4):538-549. PubMed ID: 38477149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population. Pascual MA; Vancraeynest L; Timmerman S; Ceusters J; Ledger A; Graupera B; Rodriguez I; Valero B; Landolfo C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Froyman W Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 64(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 38477179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer. Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods. Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help. Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating use of two-step International Ovarian Tumor Analysis strategy to classify adnexal masses identified in pregnancy: pilot study. Barcroft J; Pandrich M; Del Forno S; Cooper N; Linton-Reid K; Landolfo C; Timmerman D; Saso S; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Dec; 64(6):808-817. PubMed ID: 38787921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China. Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator. Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery? Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology. Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study. Du Y; Guo W; Xiao Y; Chen H; Yao J; Wu J BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Apr; 24(1):89. PubMed ID: 38622546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study. Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components. Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification. Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay. Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]