162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38749007)
1. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Microphone Frequency Response on Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice: An Examination of Low-Cost Electret Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Shaikh MA; Desjardins M; Feinstein H; Abbott KV
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Mar; 31(2):959-973. PubMed ID: 35050724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are smartphones and low-cost external microphones comparable for measuring time-domain acoustic parameters?
Ceylan ME; Cangi ME; Yılmaz G; Peru BS; Yiğit Ö
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 37584753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smartphone Recordings are Comparable to "Gold Standard" Recordings for Acoustic Measurements of Voice.
Awan SN; Shaikh MA; Awan JA; Abdalla I; Lim KO; Misono S
J Voice; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37019804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Acoustic Parameters Obtained With Different Smartphones and a Professional Microphone.
Marsano-Cornejo MJ; Roco-Videla Á
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 73(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 35190088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of naturalistic smartphone positioning on acoustic measures of voicea).
McKenna VS; Roberts RM; Friedman AD; Shanley SN; Llico AF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jul; 154(1):323-333. PubMed ID: 37450331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels.
Kisenwether JS; Sataloff RT
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plug-and-play microphones for recording speech and voice with smart devices.
Noffs G; Cobler-Lichter M; Perera T; Kolbe SC; Butzkueven H; Boonstra FMC; van der Walt A; Vogel AP
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37972580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.
Demirci AN; Köse A; Aydinli FE; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 148():110815. PubMed ID: 34217000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microphone and Audio Compression Effects on Acoustic Voice Analysis: A Pilot Study.
Cavalcanti JC; Englert M; Oliveira M; Constantini AC
J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 33451892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
