These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38750739)
1. Evaluating spray drift from Uncrewed Aerial Spray Systems: A machine learning and variance-based sensitivity analysis of environmental and spray system parameters. Jerome GF; Qianwen H; Francis D; Bernhard G; Guobin W; Yubin L; Beibei G; Jia GW; Nan JY; Volker L Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 934():173213. PubMed ID: 38750739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental, bystander and resident exposure from orchard applications using an agricultural unmanned aerial spraying system. Dubuis PH; Droz M; Melgar A; Zürcher UA; Zarn JA; Gindro K; König SLB Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 881():163371. PubMed ID: 37044339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of unmanned aerial spraying systems and related spray drift: A review. Chen P; Douzals JP; Lan Y; Cotteux E; Delpuech X; Pouxviel G; Zhan Y Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():870956. PubMed ID: 36003827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of spray drift and nontargeted soybean injury from unmanned aerial spraying system herbicide application under acceptable operation conditions. Huang Z; Wang C; Li Y; Zhang H; Zeng A; He X Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Mar; 79(3):1140-1153. PubMed ID: 36349383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the potential spray drift of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using a test bench and airborne drift collectors under low wind velocities: impact of atomization characteristics and application parameters. Wongsuk S; Zhu Z; Zheng A; Qi P; Li Y; Huang Z; Han H; Wang C; He X Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Dec; 80(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 39030971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spray losses study of two pesticides by UASS in integrated rice-crayfish farming system and acute toxicity evaluation on Liu Y; Wang G; Li Y; Zhang Z; Pang S; He X; Song J Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1212818. PubMed ID: 37767301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard. Wang C; Herbst A; Zeng A; Wongsuk S; Qiao B; Qi P; Bonds J; Overbeck V; Yang Y; Gao W; He X Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 777():146181. PubMed ID: 33689892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Droplet Size, Coverage, and Drift Potential from UAV Application Methods and Ground Application Methods on Row Crops. Gibbs J; Peters TM; Heck LP Trans ASABE; 2021; 64(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 37667776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving UASS pesticide application: optimizing and validating drift and deposition simulations. Tang Q; Zhang R; Chen L; Zhang P; Li L; Xu G; Yi T; Hewitt A Pest Manag Sci; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39287140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of UAV and fixed-wing aerial application for alfalfa insect pest control: evaluating efficacy, residues, and spray quality. Li X; Giles DK; Andaloro JT; Long R; Lang EB; Watson LJ; Qandah I Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Nov; 77(11):4980-4992. PubMed ID: 34216079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spray pesticide applications in Mediterranean citrus orchards: Canopy deposition and off-target losses. Garcerá C; Moltó E; Chueca P Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():1344-1362. PubMed ID: 28525940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. Wang G; Han Y; Li X; Andaloro J; Chen P; Hoffmann WC; Han X; Chen S; Lan Y Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 737():139793. PubMed ID: 32526578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of sprayer settings on spray drift during pesticide application in poplar plantations (Populus spp.). Grella M; Marucco P; Manzone M; Gallart M; Balsari P Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 578():427-439. PubMed ID: 27836339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative spray drift studies of aerial and ground applications 1983-1985. Frank R; Ripley BD; Lampman W; Morrow D; Collins H; Gammond GR; McCubbin P Environ Monit Assess; 1994 Jan; 29(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 24221295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Wind Speed and Direction and Key Meteorological Parameters on Potential Pesticide Drift Mass Loadings from Sequential Aerial Applications. Desmarteau DA; Ritter AM; Hendley P; Guevara MW Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 31589364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of spray drift and buffer zones in 3D crops using the ISO standard and new LiDAR methodologies. Torrent X; Gregorio E; Rosell-Polo JR; Arnó J; Peris M; van de Zande JC; Planas S Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136666. PubMed ID: 31986387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluationof compact air-induction flat fan nozzles for herbicide applications: Spray drift and biological efficacy. Wang S; Li X; Nuyttens D; Zhang L; Liu Y; Li X Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1018626. PubMed ID: 36818846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of field-scale spray drift deposition and non-target plant biological sensitivity: a corn herbicide (mesotrione/s-metolochlor) case study. Perkins DB; Abi-Akar F; Goodwin G; Brain RA Pest Manag Sci; 2022 Jul; 78(7):3193-3206. PubMed ID: 35488378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia. Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]