151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38753035)
21. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pelvicalyceal anatomy on the accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy to lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Imai S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 36305835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?
Demirbas A; Resorlu B; Sunay MM; Karakan T; Karagöz MA; Doluoglu OG
J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 27706948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis.
Akman T; Binbay M; Ugurlu M; Kaba M; Akcay M; Yazici O; Ozgor F; Muslumanoglu AY
J Endourol; 2012 Jun; 26(6):625-9. PubMed ID: 22141372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors effecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in pediatric patients with renal stones: The experience of two tertiary centres with 368 renal units.
Sen H; Baydilli N; Ozturk M; Golbasi A; Seckiner İ; Demirci D
J Pediatr Urol; 2024 Jun; 20(3):403.e1-403.e9. PubMed ID: 38267307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. RIRS with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath versus MPCNL for the Treatment of 2-4 cm Renal Stone.
Lai D; He Y; Li X; Chen M; Zeng X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8052013. PubMed ID: 32509870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective study on Comparison of outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones of 1-2 cm size.
Kanchi VBR; Pogula VMR; Galeti EH; Nekkanti R
Urol Ann; 2022; 14(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 36117798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones.
Atis G; Culpan M; Pelit ES; Canakci C; Ulus I; Gunaydin B; Yildirim A; Caskurlu T
Urol J; 2017 Mar; 14(2):2995-2999. PubMed ID: 28299761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in lateral position for lower pole stone: an initial experience from Single Academic Hospital.
Peng L; Zheng Z; Xu J; Zhong W
Urolithiasis; 2022 Apr; 50(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 35048132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm.
Koyuncu H; Yencilek F; Kalkan M; Bastug Y; Yencilek E; Ozdemir AT
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 26005965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Da Vinci Robotic Surgery in Community Patients with Renal Pelvic Stones Larger than 2 cm.
Yeh YJ; Weng SC; Lin YH; Chen CL; Tsao SH; Tsai HY; Juang HH; Chang PL; Hou CP
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jul; 59(8):. PubMed ID: 37629685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the "resorlu-unsal stone score".
Resorlu B; Unsal A; Gulec H; Oztuna D
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 22840867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Unfavorable anatomical factors influencing the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi.
Kilicarslan H; Kaynak Y; Kordan Y; Kaygisiz O; Coskun B; Gunseren KO; Kanat FM
Urol J; 2015 Apr; 12(2):2065-8. PubMed ID: 25923149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrograde intrarenal surgery as second-line therapy yields a lower success rate.
Holland R; Margel D; Livne PM; Lask DM; Lifshitz DA
J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):556-9. PubMed ID: 16903814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Scoring System for Optimal Selection of Endoscopic Treatment for 1-2cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Huang Y; Li K; Yang W; Li Z; Liu C; Lai C; He Y; Xu K
Urol J; 2022 Nov; 19(5):356-362. PubMed ID: 35689463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis.
Resorlu B; Unsal A; Tepeler A; Atis G; Tokatli Z; Oztuna D; Armagan A; Gurbuz C; Caskurlu T; Saglam R
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 22673546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.
Sari S; Ozok HU; Cakici MC; Ozdemir H; Bas O; Karakoyunlu N; Sagnak L; Senturk AB; Ersoy H
Urol J; 2017 Jan; 14(1):2949-2954. PubMed ID: 28116738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
