These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38753255)

  • 1. Erratum: A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38753255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for High-Dimensional Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Liu CW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):662-674. PubMed ID: 36262522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the Performance of the Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm in the Estimation of Multilevel Multidimensional IRT Models.
    Bashkov BM; DeMars CE
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jul; 41(5):323-337. PubMed ID: 29881095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Estimation Methods for a Multi-unidimensional Graded Response IRT Model.
    Kuo TC; Sheng Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():880. PubMed ID: 27375545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J; Tao J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():384. PubMed ID: 32210894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Two Algorithms for Calibrating the Restricted Non-Compensatory Multidimensional IRT Model.
    Wang C; Nydick SW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Mar; 39(2):119-134. PubMed ID: 29880997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaussian variational estimation for multidimensional item response theory.
    Cho AE; Wang C; Zhang X; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():52-85. PubMed ID: 33064318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Analyses of MIRT Models and Software (BMIRT and flexMIRT).
    Yavuz G; Hambleton RK
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):263-274. PubMed ID: 29795913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Urban CJ; Bauer DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 33528784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating three- and four-parameter MIRT models with importance-weighted sampling enhanced variational auto-encoder.
    Liu T; Wang C; Xu G
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():935419. PubMed ID: 36046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.
    Xu X; de la Torre J; Zhang J; Guo J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2260. PubMed ID: 33101108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Convergence Rates for the Constrained Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo.
    Zhu Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Aug; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 37628264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency.
    von Davier M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 23297749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accelerating item factor analysis on GPU with Python package xifa.
    Huang PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4403-4418. PubMed ID: 36627436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Explanatory Multidimensional Random Item Effects Rating Scale Model.
    Huang S; Luo JJ; Cai L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Dec; 83(6):1229-1248. PubMed ID: 37974656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.