125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38753554)
1. Chromosome analysis of 303 pregnancy losses in Mexico.
Garduño-Zarazúa LM; Mayén DG; Meléndez-Hernández R; Paz-Martínez AJ; Ramírez-Arroyo E; Sosa D; Aguinaga M; Pérez-Durán J; Ríos O; López-Valdez J; Torres L; Frias S
Gac Med Mex; 2024; 160(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 38753554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytogenetic Investigation in 136 Consecutive Stillbirths: Does the Tissue Type Affect the Success Rate of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype?
Marquès B; Benitez L; Peguero A; Madrigal I; Gómez O; Figueras F; Borrell A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2020; 47(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 31955157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage.
Liu S; Song L; Cram DS; Xiong L; Wang K; Wu R; Liu J; Deng K; Jia B; Zhong M; Yang F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25767059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the number of previous miscarriages influence the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in spontaneous pregnancy loss?
Goldstein M; Svirsky R; Reches A; Yaron Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):2956-2960. PubMed ID: 27923289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular analysis of miscarriage products using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): alternative to conventional karyotype analysis.
Kim JW; Lyu SW; Sung SR; Park JE; Cha DH; Yoon TK; Ko JJ; Shim SH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Feb; 291(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 25115280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytogenetic Analysis of Sporadic First-Trimester Miscarriage Specimens Using Karyotyping and QF-PCR: A Retrospective Romanian Cohort Study.
Popescu-Hobeanu G; Riza AL; Streață I; Tudorache Ș; Comănescu A; Tănase F; Drăgușin RC; Pascu C; Dijmărescu AL; Cara ML; Dorobanțu Ș; Petre-Mandache B; Cucu M; Sosoi SS; Ioana M; Iliescu D; Burada F
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36553513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.
Nikitina TV; Sazhenova EA; Zhigalina DI; Tolmacheva EN; Sukhanova NN; Lebedev IN
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Mar; 37(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 32009222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic analysis of first-trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and arrayCGH.
Zhang YX; Zhang YP; Gu Y; Guan FJ; Li SL; Xie JS; Shen Y; Wu BL; Ju W; Jenkins EC; Brown WT; Zhong N
Clin Genet; 2009 Feb; 75(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 19215247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Traditional and molecular chromosomal abnormality analysis of products of conception in spontaneous and recurrent miscarriage.
Zhang T; Sun Y; Chen Z; Li T
BJOG; 2018 Mar; 125(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 29220118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A rapid and reliable chromosome analysis method for products of conception using interphase nuclei.
Babu R; Van Dyke DL; Bhattacharya S; Dev VG; Liu M; Kwon M; Gu G; Koduru P; Rao N; Williamson C; Fuentes E; Fuentes S; Papa S; Kopuri S; Lal V
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2018 May; 6(3):370-381. PubMed ID: 29573570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.
Schaeffer AJ; Chung J; Heretis K; Wong A; Ledbetter DH; Lese Martin C
Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 15127362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique.
Karaoguz MY; Nas T; Konaç E; Ince D; Pala E; Menevse S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Dec; 31(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 16343250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dhillon RK; Hillman SC; Morris RK; McMullan D; Williams D; Coomarasamy A; Kilby MD
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23859082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages.
Diego-Alvarez D; Garcia-Hoyos M; Trujillo MJ; Gonzalez-Gonzalez C; Rodriguez de Alba M; Ayuso C; Ramos-Corrales C; Lorda-Sanchez I
Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1235-43. PubMed ID: 15760965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.
Sahoo T; Dzidic N; Strecker MN; Commander S; Travis MK; Doherty C; Tyson RW; Mendoza AE; Stephenson M; Dise CA; Benito CW; Ziadie MS; Hovanes K
Genet Med; 2017 Jan; 19(1):83-89. PubMed ID: 27337029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases.
Pylyp LY; Spynenko LO; Verhoglyad NV; Mishenko AO; Mykytenko DO; Zukin VD
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Feb; 35(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 29086320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the cause of early miscarriage with SNP-array analysis and karyotyping.
Qu S; Wang L; Cai A; Cui S; Bai N; Liu N; Kong X
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jan; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29034762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytogenetic testing of pregnancy loss tissue: a meta-analysis.
Smits MAJ; van Maarle M; Hamer G; Mastenbroek S; Goddijn M; van Wely M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun; 40(6):867-879. PubMed ID: 32417200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
