These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38753677)

  • 1. Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
    Fitzpatrick BG; Gorman DM; Trombatore C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303262. PubMed ID: 38753677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
    Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing
    Szucs D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1444. PubMed ID: 27713723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
    Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
    Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
    Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical significance and publication reporting bias in abstracts of reproductive medicine studies.
    Feng Q; Mol BW; Ioannidis JPA; Li W
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 39(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 38015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.
    Valdebenito S; Eisner M; Farrington DP; Ttofi MM; Sutherland A
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):i-216. PubMed ID: 37131379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Jager LR; Leek JT
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of CIs in health and medical journals from 1976 to 2019: an observational study.
    Barnett AG; Wren JD
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032506. PubMed ID: 31753893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consequences of relying on statistical significance: Some illustrations.
    Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW; Collins GS; Smits T
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 May; 48(5):e12912. PubMed ID: 29438579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220346. PubMed ID: 36778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research.
    Gupta A; Bosco F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281938. PubMed ID: 36827325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is N-Hacking Ever OK? The consequences of collecting more data in pursuit of statistical significance.
    Reinagel P
    PLoS Biol; 2023 Nov; 21(11):e3002345. PubMed ID: 37910647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.