These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38754249)
1. How does the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring influence women's experiences of labour? A systematic integrative review of the literature from high income countries. Murray S; Fox DJ; Coddington RL; Scarf VL Women Birth; 2024 Jul; 37(4):101619. PubMed ID: 38754249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A pilot exploratory investigation on pregnant women's views regarding STan fetal monitoring technology. Bryson K; Wilkinson C; Kuah S; Matthews G; Turnbull D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):446. PubMed ID: 29284453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wanting to be 'with woman', not with machine: Midwives' experiences of caring for women being continuously monitored in labour. Fox D; Coddington R; Scarf V Women Birth; 2022 Jul; 35(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 34556463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Australian women's experiences of wearing a non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NIFECG) device during labour. Coddington R; Scarf V; Fox D Women Birth; 2023 Nov; 36(6):546-551. PubMed ID: 36925403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experiences and outcomes on the use of telemetry to monitor the fetal heart during labour: findings from a mixed methods study. Watson K; Mills TA; Lavender T Women Birth; 2022 May; 35(3):e243-e252. PubMed ID: 34219033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of continuous foetal monitoring technologies that enable mobility in labour for women with complex pregnancies: A survey of Australian and New Zealand hospitals. Fox D; Maude R; Coddington R; Woodworth R; Scarf V; Watson K; Foureur M Midwifery; 2021 Feb; 93():102887. PubMed ID: 33260005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Thomson G; Feeley C; Moran VH; Downe S; Oladapo OT Reprod Health; 2019 May; 16(1):71. PubMed ID: 31146759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experiences of early labour management from perspectives of women, labour companions and health professionals: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Beake Rm Ma Research Associate S; Chang Ba MPhil PhD Lecturer YS; Cheyne Rm Rgn MSc PhD Professor Of Midwifery H; Spiby MPhil Rn Rm Professor Of Midwifery H; Sandall Rm MSc PhD Professor Of Social Science And Women's Health J; Bick D Midwifery; 2018 Feb; 57():69-84. PubMed ID: 29223042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's experiences of labour and birth when having a termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality in the second trimester of pregnancy: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Jones K; Baird K; Fenwick J Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():42-54. PubMed ID: 28388456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's experiences of decision-making and attitudes in relation to induction of labour: A survey study. Coates D; Donnolley N; Foureur M; Henry A Women Birth; 2021 Mar; 34(2):e170-e177. PubMed ID: 32146087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harnessing technology to enable all women mobility in labour and birth: feasibility of implementing beltless non-invasive fetal ECG applying the NASSS framework. Fox D; Coddington R; Scarf V; Bisits A; Lainchbury A; Woodworth R; Maude R; Foureur M; Sandall J Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2021 Dec; 7(1):214. PubMed ID: 34876233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. O'Brien E; Rauf Z; Alfirevic Z; Lavender T Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 23159160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 'I'm having a baby not a labour': Sense of coherence and women's attitudes towards labour and birth. Ferguson S; Davis D Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102529. PubMed ID: 31445474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tending to the machine: The impact of intrapartum fetal surveillance on women in Australia. Fox D; Coddington R; Levett KM; Scarf V; Sutcliffe KL; Newnham E PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303072. PubMed ID: 38722999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. South-Asian women's experiences of earlier additional, fetal monitoring to reduce stillbirth: An exploratory qualitative study. Tully E; Truong M; Fooladi E; Davey MA; Hodges R; Davies-Tuck ML Women Birth; 2023 Mar; 36(2):e213-e218. PubMed ID: 35902344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's information needs, decision-making and experiences of membrane sweeping to promote spontaneous labour. Roberts J; Evans K; Spiby H; Evans C; Pallotti P; Eldridge J Midwifery; 2020 Apr; 83():102626. PubMed ID: 31954296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being. Martis R; Emilia O; Nurdiati DS; Brown J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD008680. PubMed ID: 28191626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The delivery room: is it a safe place? A hermeneutic analysis of women's negative birth experiences. Nilsson C Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Dec; 5(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 25433832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]