These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38754269)

  • 1. Doctoral graduates' attitudes toward scholarly work and Institutional Review Board and Quality Improvement Committee education and submission processes: A pilot study.
    Burrell SA; McKeever A; Shearer D; Hahessy S; Battaglia E
    Nurs Outlook; 2024; 72(4):102179. PubMed ID: 38754269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.
    Kim MJ; Lee H; Kim HK; Ahn YH; Kim E; Yun SN; Lee KJ
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 19683715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mentoring students engaging in scholarly projects and dissertations in doctoral nursing programs.
    Anderson KM; McLaughlin MK; Crowell NA; Fall-Dickson JM; White KA; Heitzler ET; Kesten KS; Yearwood EL
    Nurs Outlook; 2019; 67(6):776-788. PubMed ID: 31421860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of the Scholarly Work Project by DNP/DNAP Graduates: A Preliminary Survey.
    Burns SM; Morrow M
    AANA J; 2023 Jun; 91(3):172-179. PubMed ID: 37227954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNP Program Faculty and Graduates' Knowledge and Use of QI and Safety Processes.
    Tovar E; Ossege J; Farus-Brown S; Zonsius M; Morrow L
    Nurse Educ; 2020; 45(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 31022071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of a doctor of nursing practice capstone process: programmatic revisions to improve the quality of student projects.
    Nelson JM; Cook PF; Raterink G
    J Prof Nurs; 2013; 29(6):370-80. PubMed ID: 24267931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Establishing the doctor of nursing practice project ethical review process to improve standardization, efficiency, and timeliness.
    McIltrot K; Busch DW; Van Graafeiland B; Stashinko E; Abshire M; Daniels M; Pandian V; Panchalingam S; Himmelfarb CR; D' Aoust R
    Nurs Outlook; 2022; 70(4):616-624. PubMed ID: 35513900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants for effective collaboration among DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty.
    Staffileno BA; Murphy MP; Carlson E
    Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27667700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mentoring students in doctoral nursing programs: A scoping review.
    Cleary M; Thapa DK; West S; Lopez V; Williamson M; Sahay A; Kornhaber R
    J Prof Nurs; 2023; 45():71-88. PubMed ID: 36889896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doctoral nursing education in east and Southeast Asia: characteristics of the programs and students' experiences of and satisfaction with their studies.
    Molassiotis A; Wang T; Hoang HTX; Tan JY; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Cheng KF; Tuazon JA; Kunaviktikul W; Suen LKP
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):143. PubMed ID: 32384895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Promoting DNP-PhD collaboration in doctoral education: Forming a DNP project team.
    Carlson EA; Staffileno BA; Murphy MP
    J Prof Nurs; 2018; 34(6):433-436. PubMed ID: 30527689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an institutional review board preapproval process for Doctor of Nursing Practice students: process and outcome.
    Szanton SL; Taylor HA; Terhaar M
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Jan; 52(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23230884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doctoral Education and Preparation for Nursing Faculty Roles.
    McNelis AM; Dreifuerst KT; Schwindt R
    Nurse Educ; 2019; 44(4):202-206. PubMed ID: 30256309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using social network analysis to examine collaborative relationships among PhD and DNP students and faculty in a research-intensive university school of nursing.
    Merrill JA; Yoon S; Larson E; Honig J; Reame N
    Nurs Outlook; 2013; 61(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 23036688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recommendations for evolving a doctor of nursing practice program.
    Herbert L; Slone SE; Johnson RR; Jones K; Ribar AK; Andrews JO
    J Prof Nurs; 2022; 43():12-21. PubMed ID: 36496233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the rigor and value of final scholarly projects completed by DNP nursing students.
    Roush K; Tesoro M
    J Prof Nurs; 2018; 34(6):437-443. PubMed ID: 30527690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The DNP project: Quandaries for nursing scholars.
    Dols JD; Hernández C; Miles H
    Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 27667699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professional socialization of students enrolled in an online doctor of philosophy program in nursing.
    Goodfellow LM
    J Nurs Educ; 2014 Oct; 53(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 25275993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: a comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
    Nagata S; Gregg MF; Miki Y; Arimoto A; Murashima S; Kim MJ
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 May; 32(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 21665333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journeying through the DNP project: A qualitative, descriptive study.
    Morris KA; Reese CE; Hale RD; Wendler MC
    J Prof Nurs; 2021; 37(5):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 34742503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.