BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38754541)

  • 1. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Do Clinical Outcomes Differ by Inlay versus Onlay Design?
    Meshram P; Łukasiewicz P; Okeke L; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38754541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateralized glenosphere reverse shoulder arthroplasty: inlay and onlay designs have similar clinical outcomes in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
    Meshram P; Joseph J; Zhou Y; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Apr; 31(4):747-754. PubMed ID: 34543744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.
    Freislederer F; Moroder P; Audigé L; Schneller T; Ameziane Y; Trefzer R; Imiolczyk JP; Scheibel M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):204. PubMed ID: 38454432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Larose G; Fisher ND; Gambhir N; Alben MG; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS; Kwon YW
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2410-2420. PubMed ID: 35671928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Inlay versus Onlay Humerus Implants in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Lee HJ; Yoon CY; Kim YS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36778983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
    Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Inlay and Onlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Neer Type 4 Proximal Humerus Fractures and Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Multicentric Study.
    Kahraman S; Karslioglu B; Imren Y; Keskin A; Bilsel K; Dedeoglu SS
    Indian J Orthop; 2024 Mar; 58(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 38425832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inlay vs. onlay humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study.
    Zitnay JL; Tashjian RZ; Walch G; Chalmers PN; Joyce CD; Henninger HB
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6):1377-1386. PubMed ID: 38036254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
    Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
    Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Zbinden O; Chiu JC; Boileau P; Olivier F; Walch G
    Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31900574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using an onlay humeral prosthesis, offset humeral tray, and augmented glenoid baseplate: surgical technique and review of the impact of prosthesis design on scapular fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Holliday C; Marigi EM; Marigi I; Duquin TR; Sperling JW
    JSES Rev Rep Tech; 2023 Feb; 3(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 37588074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Onlay versus inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jackson GR; Meade J; Young BL; Trofa DP; Schiffern SC; Hamid N; Saltzman BM
    Shoulder Elbow; 2023 Feb; 15(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 36895614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bony increased-offset reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an eccentric glenosphere and an onlay 135° humeral component: clinical and radiological outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Collotte P; Gauci MO; Vieira TD; Walch G
    JSES Int; 2022 May; 6(3):434-441. PubMed ID: 35572427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does lateralizing the glenosphere center of rotation by 4 mm decrease scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° humeral component?
    Harmsen SM; Robaina J; Campbell D; Denard PJ; Gobezie R; Lederman ES
    JSES Int; 2022 May; 6(3):442-446. PubMed ID: 35572439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
    Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Gauci MO; Glevarec L; Bronsard N; Cointat C; Pelletier Y; Boileau P; Gonzalez JF
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference?
    Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.